From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 307273019D9; Wed, 11 Mar 2026 20:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773261283; cv=none; b=BHhYODDBNJc8j+gBXDTZePTrx0zlA5opzr9wS/XX1S2vX44Y+auvXEfEHQg/Qu48Lk3lDgucYZh24Lxc23kc/0k03iU10oYtES6Ca4Tt6ejimCIrnxGJi8kMVNx8kYf7WWG3IoDBCTbzKw+G+b/wP8dMhOTNsgsHX0Y3NRuTxik= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773261283; c=relaxed/simple; bh=nhGqnHBNhb6lR77jGSbn+iK+EoARzRmTjgeIKb+1+Xk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AXSzuRAzKgxrzH7fFdnMwpW7W2p9xdPsFO9VgKszeY80f782mHE7QxPcfNA1bimk1YiqOd5Z4DbZL8Auq1w/rjVbpyujCgJYYouVtMhS7wnpvIlRFPXE3rF11uueYE6orX8st7mXLLMpdEilQh/YMtN1kzWGMviaubwpIhsELJk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=XaIKjO7H; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.8 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="XaIKjO7H" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1773261280; x=1804797280; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=nhGqnHBNhb6lR77jGSbn+iK+EoARzRmTjgeIKb+1+Xk=; b=XaIKjO7H7cfNRWIqcDUoKgXRdWTAbezhPFKq7+oxqGAAp3xYnoRcAIB8 2QJPbAk5NZrS8gOZ1wYJ4b07ngWedH7ZeZ3JsrtkneGQ5fNQeQ+7WKE5Q t2j03DLQcggni9h0oI2P/G0ygtHvl1VCA4mhjmdcA1qMO2hm5UrrdoD10 zzrVtBaN1y7XhXeUfBG5NpmGXdUbNJYo679sZploFAkqb4weI72ZHc3lL FEHgVMXPfItH+1heUFJAPgseCNN+tGZyFnWqVdfgJ3OQSEsNlgMxi1ElZ gCXgTxPWpTXfHymGBhpw9ol3Ox7ohWoo3ZKqa91FRO2D8ekKy2nhJCq3a Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: fTKEjvcbQ1iy9K0Msc3Tdw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9elzlPLDTMejiZo1pW7s+Q== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11726"; a="91916492" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,113,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="91916492" Received: from orviesa007.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.147]) by fmvoesa102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2026 13:34:40 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: WapVllgXS6m5Z/wQ8LZi4g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: A82fTHGUTPKb2NkcgE/mzA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,113,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="220760382" Received: from amilburn-desk.amilburn-desk (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.178]) by orviesa007-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Mar 2026 13:34:37 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2026 22:34:34 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Dan Carpenter Cc: Linus Walleij , AKASHI Takahiro , Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Bartosz Golaszewski , arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] gpio: add pinctrl based generic gpio driver Message-ID: References: <93920f541564bc4e6aaf0f2b6df2f5aca721d452.1773150895.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93920f541564bc4e6aaf0f2b6df2f5aca721d452.1773150895.git.dan.carpenter@linaro.org> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Mar 11, 2026 at 10:39:24PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > The ARM SCMI pinctrl protocol allows GPIO access. Instead of creating > a new SCMI gpio driver, this driver is a generic GPIO driver that uses > standard pinctrl interfaces. Similar wondering here... Can't this code be integrated with one of the existing generic things, like gpio-aggregator? I really don't want to see yet another generic code in this folder. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko