From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153EC3C8705; Mon, 18 May 2026 07:07:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779088022; cv=none; b=eLWFmHS/D9pOzhuR+DElp6y2mY2h02xQhz91ys86agS8tufgjLYe4gxMcgOaOPzXIPc5xsDE+lIjokZUAgpZ13cjc8QFgsaxzUXBPHq5MrUw6fYHGaN5QVViZd+STZn8gnCicVhKa7EwdzfDIrTIpptp0zIFbL5DeG1RJ/gmlzE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779088022; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DHEXSoOOKkUMqT/tGbgYU6CT2Xzxq45MhRBO5p8YVEs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Z1tWg7JFQ8dqPz67HtXmoIYbNdpv4Lbi6/piB2uVNoaRmdSFxNJ6NINF/U+N7f1zR4W2hegjzB1EU5YKmaZ6bwnV1VON/ynm5UWNX4ajkrqlN/4waT7O0Z8suPqpr4YRFTYnaB2xfGT3M5g7Y2FYs47k4wrvRSP3hasWzMYQ1eU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=nRLz8DEM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="nRLz8DEM" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1779088021; x=1810624021; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=DHEXSoOOKkUMqT/tGbgYU6CT2Xzxq45MhRBO5p8YVEs=; b=nRLz8DEMu4evWbOio9ssxvEWZrYm6gom6HIgZtDUcK78Xrb/fJJsVQxq S+W0+b/J3SJiUonfuWdwWDd+6k9G/63tenHowL5yg5DIZ17Ut+P+TQoJM ho9yiRxc852zOGbgk3cFX5Yv/4s2L4Q1pF383EOmaoFifbFD/mOIZh82c 3HaQKQhdem20nMWqWBsLxHnInc3Na4NVPXWrgypWxNK/mzO1PqBCCw4Qb qPCxnp8SAAUhuJFZnWlZllYfmrZOCxuQgvRYPyGkTxQaYQbQX9+1O2uZk tirIAHwhaxRUggPD90XDdI32Wn9jK6W9j4+W97oZRyCTtdMJGtQIOld+7 A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: uXYFn3wxQxqWkJKrVCkdPA== X-CSE-MsgGUID: +Clt3y6fQ9Ook1NbjVgCqw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11789"; a="79071954" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,241,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="79071954" Received: from fmviesa004.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.144]) by fmvoesa112.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2026 00:07:01 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 4aB3IFbWRQmirTs3dKaemQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: /1LULbm8QcCF27Gtwo19dQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.23,241,1770624000"; d="scan'208";a="241163221" Received: from fpallare-mobl4.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.244.3]) by fmviesa004-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 May 2026 00:06:33 -0700 Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 10:06:31 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Hardik Prakash Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, wsa@kernel.org, mario.limonciello@amd.com, brgl@bgdev.pl, basavaraj.natikar@amd.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/1] i2c: designware: fix probe ordering for AMD GPIO on Lenovo Yoga 7 14AGP11 Message-ID: References: <20260515161516.10474-1-hardikprakash.official@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Sun, May 17, 2026 at 10:38:57PM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote: > On Sat, May 17, 2026 at 15:21, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 09:45:15PM +0530, Hardik Prakash wrote: > > > v3: > > > - Patch 2 only (patch 1 already in Linus Walleij's tree) > > > > The patch numbering is broken. Where did 2/2 come from? > > Both patches are committed in my local tree. git format-patch counted > both commits and numbered this 2/2. I excluded the 0001 file from the > git send-email call since patch 1 is already in Linus Walleij's tree, > but the numbering carried over from the two-commit series. Don't do like this. New version should use proper --base and hence be only 1 patch. We do not confuse people by ghost patches. > Apologies for the confusion. If preferred I can resend with 1/1 > numbering by dropping patch 1 from my local branch before running > format-patch. Make sure you base your tree on the official Linus Walleij's one, this will be depicted in the cover letter when you supply proper --base to git-format-patch. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko