From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51D1426FD97; Thu, 16 Jul 2026 17:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784223770; cv=none; b=e5I/yqSEd2Az5QPjg6DHR55oL3Ay5gn57h0n8dTbamWhXGxx4KMXyXxSWuHAXL0WFHiFgGM/RaMT1JbJ75MmIo/bLinUILifO1LaDEoyAumRQBj9+V6TU2985vNFmCBDMYVLdb/Sg6U4sps6H79o4E4sRsd6dWCZUTbRA8Fu6T8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784223770; c=relaxed/simple; bh=4Fde0zH8j0vJcSOWD8DgKoqdkh+Uq+VIoVGlR1HjS7M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KuEpFo1JBNtQmwGbWKB0w14OpAXyxGHtObyc8WFH6Oe/U7G+t2A2nqw8TzASNXs81KVPhJuN/XjLRJ93pSu0DXo/f26vo3pRM5zJAW/BQk4hbgnMyuvaDpbWZbUMlvWugRR0W/ZrWih7cwDitpVnd+MtrRFC5a6c4jgLPXSle44= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=hkyxlwac; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="hkyxlwac" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1784223769; x=1815759769; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=4Fde0zH8j0vJcSOWD8DgKoqdkh+Uq+VIoVGlR1HjS7M=; b=hkyxlwacezvrjJHmD6d6jRZgg8vS4exeg4ZgRouQ3wWumENDuzLfLiJj cvbMfSP2Crqxd/bGC8Yw8W6ydNRYjrNClWdRIwymQ6Z6FTac0K/YMQqxd bPkW21/OEnZEKW9MI9aRzuyK17p5r/3Lw0zH14Juggx0OH5xss2Tik9iF zRFeESZTuHQr8+R8sLNuq7u2pQJnwxGYdAirBD5gpt6Vb2olIeHY4fSUG wCFKSKwtvMgvx9HvLV8Uf2ANzD67keyloSGUHZ7vLfQEYLCNvNmhMmmJB 4bZO9Np0NyI460RPyBJ1o2V11rxBq8w6Ovq9unGes7ZfRBpwlFRK2HkZF Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: HV0Z99LETQ64nzDVCLbYsg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VaTwpokFRu+a1Cu7TrhxcA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11848"; a="83877126" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,167,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="83877126" Received: from orviesa008.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.148]) by fmvoesa113.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 10:42:48 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 85mIzpyiTuGierS4TaWEow== X-CSE-MsgGUID: jEZkAGURRrGr75I645e1pA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.25,167,1779174000"; d="scan'208";a="256023104" Received: from conormcd-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.26]) by orviesa008-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Jul 2026 10:42:46 -0700 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 20:42:44 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig_=28The_Capable_Hub=29?= Cc: Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Michael Buesch , Andy Shevchenko , William Breathitt Gray , Robert Richter , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 20/21] gpio: Unify style of pci_device_id arrays Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 06:55:25PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote: > Update the various of_device_id arrays to conform to the most used and OF?! I guess you messed up with the patches in this series. Two mistakes I can only explain with some bad rebase happened or alike. > generally recommended coding style. That is: > > - no comma after the list terminator; > - a comma after an initializer if (and only if) the closing } is not > directly following; > - no explicit zeros in the list terminator; > - a space after an opening { and before a closing }, a single space in > the list terminator; > - at most one entry per line; > > Adapt the few offenders accordingly. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko