From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [patch 15/22] pinctrl: Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 16:10:28 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20150713072703.919712512@linutronix.de> <20150713072815.548358316@linutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:42313 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754346AbbIHOLH (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:11:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Paul Gortmaker , LKML , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Jiang Liu On Tue, 8 Sep 2015, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 11:28 PM, Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > >> From: Jiang Liu > >> > >> Use irq_desc_get_xxx() to avoid redundant lookup of irq_desc while we > >> already have a pointer to corresponding irq_desc. > > > > Hi Linus, > > > > It seems that linux-next has this copy of the patch as 5663bb27dec1, which > > has a stray irq_desc_get_irq_chip in s3c24xx ; (2nd instance of "irq" is > > bogus looking.) I first assumed it was from tglx since it did not have any > > additional SOB lines, but on further investigation I traced it back to sfr's > > merge of pinctrl/for-next. > > Hm, saw this a bit late I guess. > > Torvalds has merged my trees, is there a problem in mainline > that need to be addressed or did this fix itself? No, it's buggered in Linus tree as well.