From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [PATCH for 4.12] Revert "pinctrl: rockchip: avoid hardirq-unsafe functions in irq_chip" Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2017 20:07:25 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: References: <20170517225634.GA11404@google.com> <20170527021900.GA119873@google.com> <20170623205911.GA143883@google.com> <20170627000622.GA63039@google.com> <20170627172306.GA91202@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170627172306.GA91202@google.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Brian Norris Cc: Linus Walleij , Heiko Stuebner , linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Julia Cartwright , LKML , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, John Keeping , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Doug Anderson , "Paul E. McKenney" , Peter Zijlstra , Tony Lindgren , "David.Wu" , =?ISO-2022-JP?Q?'=1B$B2+Es=1B=28J'?= List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 27 Jun 2017, Brian Norris wrote: > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:06:26PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > That said, the commit should be reverted and the issue needs to analyzed > > proper. We still need the RCU -> SCRU conversion, but that's a different > > problem. > > Can we consider this an "ack" for the $subject then? Heiko also gave his > approval. How can this get merged? It's running a bit late for 4.12, > though it really shouldn't be risky (at least for non-RT stuff that was > working warning-free already in 4.11), but a 4.13-rc1 with -stable tag > could work as well. Yes. That revert can go into 4.12 from my POV, but I leave that to Linus. Thanks, tglx