From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-oo1-f49.google.com (mail-oo1-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ADE03A451D for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2026 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.49 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785851778; cv=none; b=bfH3mbEo6Mu1GocC6Gph0bKm0wi0yVZ8GN9JuDcNJQTbjaYls5Qh5Lg03PAkKn+vC98XimjczDcVhmXuOxGi/v3RqYms35DAE5wtokPPyXBerNifIrSeaCuBGVGXeJCrVj7jkPeUVjtrlI5xMTUD0bjytGEo0p8dmJagTTNEUms= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785851778; c=relaxed/simple; bh=50XrKBZJosL/DTC37lRfslzDFV1+RDFjg0YN60AJyx8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=iPwhDxtXfMGeLfDwqzjCoKdeYosU4Gt70X2SPDGB8beLLdg4Q03UtuoT9iJHw/8lSbJx7rLkov+tEQ5vAgMvNrYytdcdx7QiWPBCiiApTTnKtM1VoH9BWBylGqnuah0ORJrFUOm/xNnQ0y+iMozW76kA3sRDuhpehplzXZMgfnE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=minyard.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=minyard.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=minyard.net header.i=@minyard.net header.b=b/1NDoUy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.161.49 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=minyard.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=minyard.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=minyard.net header.i=@minyard.net header.b="b/1NDoUy" Received: by mail-oo1-f49.google.com with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-6aca0f482e5so2976412eaf.2 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:56:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=minyard.net; s=google; t=1785851775; x=1786456575; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=sXXO2IRcaN/cQzNifZvrT3g0gNImnjqVwD0ab/RL39s=; b=b/1NDoUy/7IMpygxxmh+dw5mFHeaOjwbwLXSW0R01H6LpTQIcHrVha0xc8HP+ApBC1 uCghuNmFo/nwRiG2cnV8XNtFd4Bz5WOVhOq/grrKP2UMov264Equ7lkAwHek3KI3OYGE H5GcBppL7CRjsohHh78TBGOT7j8G3mpqFuu6QHNrTxr9AdpJKwmDV+qH1IhlgCj5M1W5 LnTPSlmIiCx8ufI0oh7XkvA0EvPGEww1wSc8mlFZDK9zsVjRna/HrQeerbKXehm9CMkT jAfyzyudM+5iJtmRNTgP05yEdX7Q8IUCmi4/IpfC4eiBdGFF0TxkG40BShj+dHpVHmQj z6vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1785851775; x=1786456575; h=in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :content-type:mime-version:references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=sXXO2IRcaN/cQzNifZvrT3g0gNImnjqVwD0ab/RL39s=; b=ZlE9yNPntZRQS8ErTmoeeRN07NA8ZtiNcyXsdwKBAGwwfLnO9pVml8djDst97Yed42 C4iQSLH4mUBJrFHQyLWgv+rjs3KEhxNegsIrtrT2dY9KufYx9O1upkvvzrTnRfT0Di8N UCy7R2SMgs6rcmzWcShSNqg728/AmS8P2hXuk99R9IB1dYbMRnKB1rTp6gtq5Cd5TwAm /0LsLn0zL82ekzrSY5IMJsjZNsJal1HiLjL3VgR2Ks2qkOvkMcfEIggK8gP87gsyNp3x k2vwJr67MfZr1/3PHDiq5fYuxX0VOvFoU8xjW6HJ1HoTyyKQlBiMe551HU/J3j467XAa 4c4g== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AHgh+Rqp5JwkNF3s99JIV/Zjm7nJZ5/m6y67qBoBqoAo9BM2W7L8YwN4FKAeym2rSUJnnJgV1DgSFGnCQ7hZ@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzAUYqKlwX7CgpsTRT8bxgZ+NTzJBQrI0PZH5tl7zgJpA+DpZbP BOWp6guqxd8rxy75kFflzZ3NKzupS1CpSv+q7e+foWQMnF6Y2rltJ2I3FSj5tBIxxl4= X-Gm-Gg: AR+sD10BmneXRHBYnJ9b88yn6hjcZijrkK1BApa/Ke8cmwOXlBSjbcy8Pd2/sNe5t1M mQdNNRqXrqCQxZI2UQ6kDbsiQAFADtRjlCUlhxeTtbrWw243kR5wSoN3Db6KzHhzVIjQUEhLf4W 6wjU291KBSILricYNbGsEIo7Ufy94mtKRXqIu6ltaMKHBPH8nKmnDu1TDAUkiix/CBnsRokU7W/ pkPVArC48PmnKiffanTrqujTN+KPIET53XNzuBaR7YLIGIko1BLx1JfaijvDDWBNU8Khrpp9gWQ QRi0aC9t8OuPzrTdD6cZbAOGLIh42Vkjm2AnxUhl84sh47BfkuiYZrjL/GzA2ozM+H54x+wSLVC Gp8VgbMD8xD0TxKDPjoCR4VxcD9XH0dp/wT76YkkCMVp70F8sJb8UK0DJYeavogGT26ziSezp18 5B1BOq9HWaoyTd/9qrbBi067KqMnqDELJS1AoLQG4p8c+G0+y1rPt1iSD48v0g+6t7mQ6IkjPs4 m9e+dmzgIANXAZZr9aymvmD/B+FwNjd3TyRux+a+ByLNkHk2qaFovSZBRiqYsC+JOMff58ixZav fJlH+ypI1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6820:430a:b0:6ac:b07c:b34b with SMTP id 006d021491bc7-6ae43181091mr17136344eaf.4.1785851775253; Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:56:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.minyard.net ([2001:470:b8f6:1b:398b:b195:5c26:85bd]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 006d021491bc7-6ae93d45b4csm171955eaf.5.2026.08.04.06.56.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 04 Aug 2026 06:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2026 08:56:11 -0500 From: Corey Minyard To: Miao Wang Cc: Binbin Zhou , Chong Qiao , Lee Jones , Huacai Chen , Linus Walleij , Bartosz Golaszewski , Xi Ruoyao , WANG Xuerui , Yinbo Zhu , Jiaxun Yang , mfd@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5 5/7] ipmi: ls2k: Relax the dependency to its mfd driver Message-ID: Reply-To: corey@minyard.net References: <20260804-ls2kbmc-mod-v5-0-e6bc5cdd9a93@gmail.com> <20260804-ls2kbmc-mod-v5-5-e6bc5cdd9a93@gmail.com> <2E268CDE-1D85-4611-BFF7-F74DD36132AB@gmail.com> <34EE213F-DA1A-4103-AAE9-85618954C846@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <34EE213F-DA1A-4103-AAE9-85618954C846@gmail.com> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 08:27:11PM +0800, Miao Wang wrote: > Hi, > > > 2026年8月4日 19:39，Corey Minyard 写道： > > > > On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 05:40:14PM +0800, Miao Wang wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >>> 2026年8月4日 04:46，Corey Minyard 写道： > >>> > >>> On Tue, Aug 04, 2026 at 12:55:53AM +0800, Miao Wang via B4 Relay wrote: > >>>> From: Miao Wang > >>>> > >>>> There is no strong dependency between the IPMI driver and its mfd > >>>> driver. Although the IPMI driver will not work without the mfd driver, > >>>> it is not a hard dependency. The IPMI driver can actually be compiled > >>>> without the mfd driver, and it will just fail to probe. When the mfd > >>>> driver is loaded, the IPMI driver will probe successfully. Therefore, > >>>> the dependency of the IPMI driver on its mfd driver should be relaxed > >>>> to "imply" from "select". This will allow the mfd driver to be compiled > >>>> as a module and the IPMI driver to be compiled as a part of the ipmi_si > >>>> module. The adjustment to Kconfig for the mfd driver will be introduced > >>>> in the later patch in this series. > >>> > >>> I don't think that's what "imply" is for. Imply seems to be for if > >>> there is another subsystem that can use this subsystem, but doesn't > >>> require it to exist. > >>> > >>> For instance: > >>> > >>> config SENSORS_NPCM7XX > >>> tristate "Nuvoton NPCM750 and compatible PWM and Fan controllers" > >>> imply THERMAL > >>> > >>> The fan controller will work fine without the thermal subsystem; you > >>> can control the fan speed without it. But the thermal subsystem is the > >>> logical user of this. I looked at many of these things like this. > >>> > >>> In the IPMI case, the IPMI driver is useless without the mfd part. So > >>> there's no point in compiling the IPMI part of this if the mfd part is > >>> not there. > >>> > >>> I could be wrong, but I can't see why you would want to do this. > >> > >> The mfd part and the IPMI part loosely depend on each other. Without the > >> IPMI part, the mfd part can still work to handle the display part. > >> Without the mfd part, the IPMI part is indeed useless, but it will not > >> generate compiling errors or other runtime errors. In the runtime, > >> the IPMI part can be actually loaded earlier than the mfd part. As a > >> result, their dependency is not that strong. > > > > The operational dependency is strong, which is what I think you want to > > convey here. > > > >> > >> The reason why I want to change this is that "select" here requires the > >> mfd part should also be compiled as built-in (i.e. = y), since the > >> type of the configure entry IPMI_LS2K is bool. However, I cannot see > >> there is no other reason preventing the mfd driver from compiling as > >> a module. This patch series will introduce a minor fix, after which > >> the mfd driver will be capable to be compiled as a module. > >> > >> When the type of MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE is changed to tristate, the "select" > >> here will prevent selecting =m for MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE. I thus believe > >> that "select" here should be also changed. > >> > >> Any suggestions on declaring the dependency of the both parts? > > > > Ok, I understand now. > > > > Why can't the IPMI part be compiled as a module? Making that > > module-capable would be the right fix, I think. I can't see > > why that wouldn't work. IIRC, it was bool because the mfd part > > was bool. > > I would have agree with you if the IPMI part was a normal driver. > However, the IPMI part is actually a part of ipmi_si. As a result, > the IPMI part can actually be compiled as a module, but as a part > of ipmi_si. That is why the configure entry IPMI_LS2K is bool rather > than tristate. I don't think it is trivial to convert IPMI_LS2K from > bool to tristate. Yes, you are right it would be non-trivial. It would take some redesign of the ipmi_si module. You are right here, probably not worth it. > > > If you changed to imply, you would need a depends on the mfd core, BTW. > > If imply is used here, and there is "select MFD_CORE" in MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE, > I think there is no need to add "depends on MFD_CORE" to IPMI_LS2K, if I > understand it correctly. If imply doesn't force MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE to be selected, then it's not going to force MFD_CORE to be selected. > > I don't insist using imply here, if there is a better way to express the > relation between both drivers. > > > Also, IPMI_LS2K needs a "depends on IPMI_SI" either way. I missed that > > earlier. Could you add that? > > If I understand it correctly, there seems to be no need to add the > dependency from the MFD driver to the driver for the actual sub-functions. > Examples are: There absolutely is. You can select IPMI_LS2K without selecting IPMI_SI. It would compile without it, and it just wouldn't do anything, but it would be confusing to be able to select something and it not do anything. > > - MFD_MENF21BMC and SENSORS_MENF21BMC_HWMON, LEDS_MENF21BMC, > MENF21BMC_WATCHDOG: The later three declared depends on the former MFD > driver > - MFD_INTEL_M10_BMC_CORE and FPGA_M10_BMC_SEC_UPDATE, > SENSORS_INTEL_M10_BMC_HWMON: The later two declared depends on the > former MFD driver. > - MFD_STMFX and PINCTRL_STMFX: The later declared select the former > MFD driver. > > To summarize, as shown in the current mfd drivers, there is no need to > declare dependency to the drivers providing the sub-functions in the > mfd drivers, and the drivers of the sub functions should "depends on" or > "select" the mfd driver. So if IPMI_LS2K could be tristate, then it would > be reasonable to select MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE or depends on MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE. > > > Regarding the fact that IPMI_LS2K is bool and it is not an independent > module but a part of ipmi_si, it comes into my mind that we may choose > to adjust the dependency from ipmi_si. That is to remove "select > MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE" from IPMI_LS2K, and add "select MFD_LS2K_BMC_CORE > if IPMI_LS2K" to IPMI_SI. > > I wonder if such a change would be appropriate. That would be a good solution if it works. Thanks for working with me on this. -corey > > Cheers, > > Miao Wang >