From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62F714B95C0; Tue, 13 Oct 2026 09:46:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791884789; cv=none; b=Be/+cQAAP/UY17Gf3/OQEivJjWTPZg6VxoyhxPpWVJI9bVrn/SXMO9vjkoRkJArCbwIsJw2ZBusP6syPY4/URPjP6pp9UG+c4h21oV4wgmsr/xzznUq6mwqhBQ7VXH7gzrscQImYMsNSkzlNJ4S3pWO3wP/fqFBWNDHtLlurUTM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1791884789; c=relaxed/simple; bh=dsQ3c3r30MByiQl80F9uySddLkO/UAS3WgjYmjdt+fs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=meOysWyzREQ35qCXeOs4pzgT4KFHch//RdL1QZUOXe6lQSmb+oLGMCzhYc0nDVAzzf8y0ag9YensTgqIbcY/nGEbt/3KFl68IstxRynRaA51xCWJCiSg7JerFucIvlwa8CCRjuz+IC2n7SpjR1Zqwxh+GkdzZ9/ZTeuIrQFA954= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=J8F5AjUs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.7 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="J8F5AjUs" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1791884787; x=1823420787; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=dsQ3c3r30MByiQl80F9uySddLkO/UAS3WgjYmjdt+fs=; b=J8F5AjUseXBAZY/iEPMxONLDQOgT8Ln4zjDklWKSn7eyNzRufP3ptSiN eemGACbL+ezF4Xy1/Hz3jWUz654rAGtiLOhJKC+M7VGcgM/xoMUYSaSRY R/4F1EfvUGZSkzTRQPUdeRJyWQPSyyapAJJxLdWdPNLi4XbvLj3VEldbV OZnTpsnLUPp0ZZosH5H4enZtGFGsmcTnJye4JR7cuomNTXxw0Fu8N6h74 uyg/wKfR010ALPXuNxPeDNtZFfMhsVQ3QqoU/lQhHGdD4UDfY8vQ4rOp6 DpoM24zsF1LtApDUerWdEK+0sfTIOhIR4NhDBy6jx47R+q25Sss2lqQkc w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: a9koeaZnRXyKlN+QBWmI/Q== X-CSE-MsgGUID: KD67smqoQFeuOdSWBeUn7A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11933"; a="504747" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="504747" Received: from orviesa002.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.142]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 02:46:27 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: jFIpIThAT2iEEf0urpX9OQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: smM8Y3woQKiB7j0xfwBQXA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.27,155,1787036400"; d="scan'208";a="1091222" Received: from ncintean-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.245.245.48]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Oct 2026 02:46:23 -0700 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2026 12:46:21 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: zl020895 Cc: longzhao@ambarella.com, Bartosz Golaszewski , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, Linus Walleij , Michael Walle , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH 7/7] gpio: pl061: add Ambarella register-layout variant Message-ID: References: <20261009-cv75-gpio-v1-0-5836bd438423@ambarella.com> <20261009-cv75-gpio-v1-7-5836bd438423@ambarella.com> <179f2223.7d43.1a1347ce995.Coremail.zl020895@163.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <179f2223.7d43.1a1347ce995.Coremail.zl020895@163.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 04:59:23PM +0800, zl020895 wrote: > You did give Reviewed-by earlier. After that > tag the commit gained the DAT cache, so I dropped the tag because the > code changed. If you are still fine with that version, I will restore > it. Yes, I'm fine, please keep it, it was not that change that requires reconsideration, but thanks for explaining the reason why. > >Ick?! I thought I gave a tag for this. What's going on? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko