linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	Roman Guskov <rguskov@dh-electronics.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties"
Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2021 13:12:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c0d38f33-b64e-5663-e57c-802a22081fa3@denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YEIeH5nq/dgTqO5A@smile.fi.intel.com>

On 3/5/21 1:03 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 11:51:02AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>> On 3/5/21 11:44 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 12:09:56AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>> This reverts 7cba1a4d5e162 ("gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names()
>>>> for device properties") because this breaks OF "gpio-line-names" behavior on
>>>> STM32MP1 platform.
>>>>
>>>> On STM32MP1, the GPIO banks are subnodes of pin-controller@50002000, see
>>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi. The driver for pin-controller@50002000
>>>> is in drivers/pinctrl/stm32/pinctrl-stm32.c and iterates over all of its DT
>>>> subnodes when registering each GPIO bank gpiochip. Each gpiochip has:
>>>> - gpio_chip.parent = dev where dev is the device node of the pin controller
>>>> - gpio_chip.of_node = np which is the OF node of the GPIO bank
>>>> Therefore, dev_fwnode(chip->parent) != of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node) , i.e.
>>>> pin-controller@50002000 != pin-controller@50002000/gpio@5000*000.
>>>>
>>>> The original code behaved correctly, as it extracted the "gpio-line-names"
>>>> from of_fwnode_handle(chip.of_node) = pin-controller@50002000/gpio@5000*000.
>>>> This patch reinstates the original correct behavior.
>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>
>>>> Reported-by: Roman Guskov <rguskov@dh-electronics.com>
>>>
>>> Thanks for the report and a fix!
>>> However I think the revert is not an option. We may do much better.
>>
>> The revert is pretty much also the minimal change to reinstate the original
>> behavior. What better option do you have in mind, please do elaborate in
>> detail. Thank you.
> 
> Patch has been tested and just sent. Please test it on your side.

That one is even better and works too, thanks.

      reply	other threads:[~2021-03-05 12:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04 23:09 [PATCH] Revert "gpiolib: generalize devprop_gpiochip_set_names() for device properties" Marek Vasut
2021-03-05 10:44 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-05 10:51   ` Marek Vasut
2021-03-05 12:03     ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-03-05 12:12       ` Marek Vasut [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c0d38f33-b64e-5663-e57c-802a22081fa3@denx.de \
    --to=marex@denx.de \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rguskov@dh-electronics.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).