From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linux GPIO <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
Daniel Scally <djrscally@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 5.14-1
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 11:20:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cb18b7d2-8636-feed-e9f8-212ce7aa7eff@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <75eae548-fd62-1be6-498d-9664d9c7deab@redhat.com>
Hi,
On 7/5/21 11:16 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 7/5/21 11:03 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 5:09 PM Andy Shevchenko
>> <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2021 at 06:12:10PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>>> Hi Linux GPIO and TWIMC maintainers,
>>>>
>>>> This is GPIO material for v5.14 cycle. It contains some stuff that other
>>>> subsystems may take due to dependencies. Consider this tag immutable.
>>>
>>> Bart, any comments on this? Can you, please, pull?
>>>
>>> --
>>> With Best Regards,
>>> Andy Shevchenko
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Hi Andy,
>>
>> I was looking for you PR for this cycle and couldn't find it in my
>> inbox. Somehow this went into spam. I'll make sure your email never
>> goes to spam again. Sorry. I'm seeing Hand pulled it, is that right?
>>
>> Hans: did you take the entire thing?
>
> Andy send me a pull-req for the intel-gpio-v5.14-1 tag because that
> contained some dependencies for a new driver which I was merging into
> drivers/platform/x86.
>
> Given the name of the tag (and the contents) I think it is the entire
> thing and not a topic branch with just the things which the driver needed,
> I assume the pull-req Andy send to you probably also was for that tag?
>
> If that is right then this indeed has already landed in Linus' tree
> through the platform-drivers-x86 tree.
I just noticed that this email is part of the same thread as the
pull-req which I merged, IOW it is the same pull-req as which ended
up in your spam folder.
So yes I believe that I took the entire thing.
Regards,
Hans
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-05 9:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-07 15:12 [GIT PULL] intel-gpio for 5.14-1 Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-14 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-05 9:03 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2021-07-05 9:16 ` Hans de Goede
2021-07-05 9:20 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2021-07-05 9:35 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-06-16 14:41 ` Hans de Goede
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cb18b7d2-8636-feed-e9f8-212ce7aa7eff@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=djrscally@gmail.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).