linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Maulik Shah <mkshah@codeaurora.org>,
	Srinivas Ramana <sramana@codeaurora.org>,
	Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@codeaurora.org>,
	Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>,
	Andy Gross <agross@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:00:31 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d65e2be33a218751e7be3342e490e076@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123160139.1.I2702919afc253e2a451bebc3b701b462b2d22344@changeid>

On 2020-11-24 00:01, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> We have a problem if we use gpio-keys and configure wakeups such that
> we only want one edge to wake us up.  AKA:
>   wakeup-event-action = <EV_ACT_DEASSERTED>;
>   wakeup-source;
> 
> Specifically we end up with a phantom interrupt that blocks suspend if
> the line was already high and we want wakeups on rising edges (AKA we
> want the GPIO to go low and then high again before we wake up).  The
> opposite is also problematic.
> 
> Specifically, here's what's happening today:
> 1. Normally, gpio-keys configures to look for both edges.  Due to the
>    current workaround introduced in commit c3c0c2e18d94 ("pinctrl:
>    qcom: Handle broken/missing PDC dual edge IRQs on sc7180"), if the
>    line was high we'd configure for falling edges.
> 2. At suspend time, we change to look for rising edges.
> 3. After qcom_pdc_gic_set_type() runs, we get a phantom interrupt.
> 
> We can solve this by just clearing the phantom interrupt.
> 
> NOTE: it is possible that this could cause problems for a client with
> very specific needs, but there's not much we can do with this
> hardware.  As an example, let's say the interrupt signal is currently
> high and the client is looking for falling edges.  The client now
> changes to look for rising edges.  The client could possibly expect
> that if the line has a short pulse low (and back high) that it would
> always be detected.  Specifically no matter when the pulse happened,
> it should either have tripped the (old) falling edge trigger or the
> (new) rising edge trigger.  We will simply not trip it.  We could
> narrow down the race a bit by polling our parent before changing
> types, but no matter what we do there will still be a period of time
> where we can't tell the difference between a real transition (or more
> than one transition) and the phantom.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
> ---
> 
>  drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> index bd39e9de6ecf..7d097164aadc 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/qcom-pdc.c
> @@ -159,6 +159,8 @@ static int qcom_pdc_gic_set_type(struct irq_data
> *d, unsigned int type)
>  {
>  	int pin_out = d->hwirq;
>  	enum pdc_irq_config_bits pdc_type;
> +	enum pdc_irq_config_bits old_pdc_type;
> +	int ret;
> 
>  	if (pin_out == GPIO_NO_WAKE_IRQ)
>  		return 0;
> @@ -187,9 +189,24 @@ static int qcom_pdc_gic_set_type(struct irq_data
> *d, unsigned int type)
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
> 
> +	old_pdc_type = pdc_reg_read(IRQ_i_CFG, pin_out);
>  	pdc_reg_write(IRQ_i_CFG, pin_out, pdc_type);
> 
> -	return irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
> +	ret = irq_chip_set_type_parent(d, type);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * When we change types the PDC can give a phantom interrupt.
> +	 * Clear it.  Specifically the phantom shows up if a line is already
> +	 * high and we change to rising or if a line is already low and we
> +	 * change to falling but let's be consistent and clear it always.
> +	 *
> +	 * Doing this works because we have IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED so the
> +	 * interrupt will be cleared before the rest of the system sees it.
> +	 */
> +	if (old_pdc_type != pdc_type)
> +		irq_chip_set_parent_state(d, IRQCHIP_STATE_PENDING, 0);

nit: s/0/false/.

You could also make it conditional on the parent side having been 
successful.
And while we're looking at this: do you need to rollback the PDC state
if the GIC side has failed? It's all very hypothetical, but just in 
case...

> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
> 
>  static struct irq_chip qcom_pdc_gic_chip = {

It otherwise looks sensible. Is that a fix for 5.10?

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-11-24  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-24  0:01 [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24  0:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Allow SoCs to specify a GPIO function that's not 0 Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24  0:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: qcom: Clear possible pending irq when remuxing GPIOs Douglas Anderson
2020-11-24  8:27   ` Linus Walleij
2020-11-24 10:37   ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 11:15     ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 12:43       ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 13:06         ` Marc Zyngier
2020-11-24 17:33     ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24  7:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] irqchip: qcom-pdc: Fix phantom irq when changing between rising/falling Maulik Shah
2020-11-24  8:28 ` Linus Walleij
2020-11-24 16:55   ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24 17:42     ` Maulik Shah
2020-11-24 17:46       ` Doug Anderson
2020-11-24  9:00 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2020-11-24 17:01   ` Doug Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d65e2be33a218751e7be3342e490e076@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=agross@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkshah@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sramana@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).