linux-gpio.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
	"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: add support for bias pull disable
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:47:49 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7416381e57a4a065616105952926552b7c70415.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtAxaCsQTrUiI4ir@smile.fi.intel.com>

On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 18:08 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:02:08PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 20:00 +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> 
> ...
> 
> > > If that solves your immediate problem then you need to decide
> > > what
> > > problem your patch is trying to address.
> > 
> > So my patch is trying to solve exactly this case because (IMO), it
> > does
> > not make sense for consumers drivers to have to do the above code.
> > Moreover, they would need some custom firmware property (eg:
> > devicetree) for the cases where we want to disable BIAS since we
> > cannot
> > just assume we want to do it.
> 
> Why? This is the main question. Why do you need that _in kernel_ API.
> 
> > Well, maybe we can just assume FLAG_BIAS_DISABLE in gpiolib (when
> > trying to get the gpiod) if no PULL is specified. However, I do
> > have
> > some concerns with it (see my conversation with Andy in the cover).
> 
> It's AS IS if you trust firmware.
> 

In my use case, there's no firmware controlling the pin... The input
driver (which exposes the gpichip) directly controls the pins and I
want to have a way to tell it (from firmware) to disable the BIAS if
users want to do so (by default it's pull-up)...

- Nuno Sá

  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-14 15:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-13 13:14 [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable Nuno Sá
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: add support for bias pull disable Nuno Sá
2022-07-13 17:36   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14  4:20     ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14  7:14       ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14  8:27         ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14  8:47           ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 12:00             ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14 13:02               ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 15:08                 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 15:47                   ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2022-07-18 10:44     ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] gpiolib: of: support " Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:30   ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] gpiolib: acpi: " Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:32   ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 10:49     ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 13:49       ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 18:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:33   ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 20:52   ` Rob Herring
2022-07-13 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14  7:09   ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14  9:12     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14  9:49       ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 14:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 15:43   ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 18:57     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-15 10:20       ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-15 12:05         ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-15 12:20           ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-15 19:31             ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-18  7:51               ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:29                 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 10:46                   ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:25               ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-19  8:25 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-19  8:52   ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-19  9:14     ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-19 10:21       ` Nuno Sá

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=d7416381e57a4a065616105952926552b7c70415.camel@gmail.com \
    --to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).