From: "Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Kent Gibson" <warthog618@gmail.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
"Bartosz Golaszewski" <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
"Frank Rowand" <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
"Mika Westerberg" <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: add support for bias pull disable
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2022 17:47:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7416381e57a4a065616105952926552b7c70415.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YtAxaCsQTrUiI4ir@smile.fi.intel.com>
On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 18:08 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 03:02:08PM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
> > On Thu, 2022-07-14 at 20:00 +0800, Kent Gibson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 10:47:27AM +0200, Nuno Sá wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > If that solves your immediate problem then you need to decide
> > > what
> > > problem your patch is trying to address.
> >
> > So my patch is trying to solve exactly this case because (IMO), it
> > does
> > not make sense for consumers drivers to have to do the above code.
> > Moreover, they would need some custom firmware property (eg:
> > devicetree) for the cases where we want to disable BIAS since we
> > cannot
> > just assume we want to do it.
>
> Why? This is the main question. Why do you need that _in kernel_ API.
>
> > Well, maybe we can just assume FLAG_BIAS_DISABLE in gpiolib (when
> > trying to get the gpiod) if no PULL is specified. However, I do
> > have
> > some concerns with it (see my conversation with Andy in the cover).
>
> It's AS IS if you trust firmware.
>
In my use case, there's no firmware controlling the pin... The input
driver (which exposes the gpichip) directly controls the pins and I
want to have a way to tell it (from firmware) to disable the BIAS if
users want to do so (by default it's pull-up)...
- Nuno Sá
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-14 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-13 13:14 [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable Nuno Sá
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 1/4] gpiolib: add support for bias pull disable Nuno Sá
2022-07-13 17:36 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 4:20 ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14 7:14 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 8:27 ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14 8:47 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 12:00 ` Kent Gibson
2022-07-14 13:02 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 15:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 15:47 ` Nuno Sá [this message]
2022-07-18 10:44 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 2/4] gpiolib: of: support " Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:30 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 3/4] gpiolib: acpi: " Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:32 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 10:49 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 13:49 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 18:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-13 13:14 ` [PATCH 4/4] dt-bindings: gpio: add pull-disable flag Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:33 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 20:52 ` Rob Herring
2022-07-13 17:39 ` [PATCH 0/4] add support for bias pull-disable Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 7:09 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 9:12 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 9:49 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 14:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-14 15:43 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-14 18:57 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-15 10:20 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-15 12:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-15 12:20 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-15 19:31 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-18 7:51 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:29 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-18 10:46 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-18 10:25 ` Linus Walleij
2022-07-19 8:25 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-19 8:52 ` Nuno Sá
2022-07-19 9:14 ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2022-07-19 10:21 ` Nuno Sá
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7416381e57a4a065616105952926552b7c70415.camel@gmail.com \
--to=noname.nuno@gmail.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=warthog618@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).