[PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for Kontron OSM-S i.MX93 SoM and carrier board

[PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for Kontron OSM-S i.MX93 SoM and carrier board

[Frieder Schrempf]

From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Patch 1-2: small DT binding fixups
Patch 3: board DT bindings
Patch 4: support PMIC driver without IRQ
Patch 5: add devicetrees

Changes for v2:
* remove applied patches 1 and 2
* add tags
* improvements suggested by Krzysztof (thanks!)
* add missing Makefile entry for DT

Frieder Schrempf (5):
  dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set
  dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: Make interrupt optional
  dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Kontron i.MX93 OSM-S based boards
  regulator: pca9450: Make IRQ optional
  arm64: dts: Add support for Kontron i.MX93 OSM-S SoM and BL carrier
    board

 .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |   6 +
 .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml  |   4 +
 .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml      |   1 -
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |   1 +
 .../dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dts  | 165 ++++++
 .../dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-osm-s.dtsi    | 547 ++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c         |  41 +-
 7 files changed, 742 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dts
 create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-osm-s.dtsi

-- 
2.45.2

[PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set

[Frieder Schrempf]

From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>

Describe common "gpio-line-names" property to allow DTs to
specify names for GPIO lines.

Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
---
Changes for v2:
* change commit message (remove non-existing warning)
* add minItems and maxItems
---
 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
index a27f929502575..cabda2eab4a23 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ properties:
 
   gpio-controller: true
 
+  gpio-line-names:
+    minItems: 1
+    maxItems: 32
+
   clocks:
     items:
       - description: SoC GPIO clock
-- 
2.45.2

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 08/07/2024 10:40, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> 
> Describe common "gpio-line-names" property to allow DTs to
> specify names for GPIO lines.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> ---

Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for Kontron OSM-S i.MX93 SoM and carrier board

[Rob Herring (Arm)]

On Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:40:30 +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> From: Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@kontron.de>
> 
> Patch 1-2: small DT binding fixups
> Patch 3: board DT bindings
> Patch 4: support PMIC driver without IRQ
> Patch 5: add devicetrees
> 
> Changes for v2:
> * remove applied patches 1 and 2
> * add tags
> * improvements suggested by Krzysztof (thanks!)
> * add missing Makefile entry for DT
> 
> Frieder Schrempf (5):
>   dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set
>   dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: Make interrupt optional
>   dt-bindings: arm: fsl: Add Kontron i.MX93 OSM-S based boards
>   regulator: pca9450: Make IRQ optional
>   arm64: dts: Add support for Kontron i.MX93 OSM-S SoM and BL carrier
>     board
> 
>  .../devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml          |   6 +
>  .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-vf610.yaml  |   4 +
>  .../regulator/nxp,pca9450-regulator.yaml      |   1 -
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/Makefile        |   1 +
>  .../dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dts  | 165 ++++++
>  .../dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-osm-s.dtsi    | 547 ++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/regulator/pca9450-regulator.c         |  41 +-
>  7 files changed, 742 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dts
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-osm-s.dtsi
> 
> --
> 2.45.2
> 
> 


My bot found new DTB warnings on the .dts files added or changed in this
series.

Some warnings may be from an existing SoC .dtsi. Or perhaps the warnings
are fixed by another series. Ultimately, it is up to the platform
maintainer whether these warnings are acceptable or not. No need to reply
unless the platform maintainer has comments.

If you already ran DT checks and didn't see these error(s), then
make sure dt-schema is up to date:

  pip3 install dtschema --upgrade


New warnings running 'make CHECK_DTBS=y freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dtb' for 20240708084107.38986-1-frieder@fris.de:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dtb: eeprom@50: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dtb: eeprom@50: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c00$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c01$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs01$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c02$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs02$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'mac402$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'mac602$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c04$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs04$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c08$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs08$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c16$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs16$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c32$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs32$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c64$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs64$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c128$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs128$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c256$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs256$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c512$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs512$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c1024$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs1024$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c1025$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs1025$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'c2048$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'cs2048$'
		'onnn,n24s64b' does not match 'spd$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c00$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c01$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs01$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c02$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs02$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'mac402$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'mac602$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c04$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs04$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c08$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs08$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c16$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs16$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c32$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs32$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs64$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c128$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs128$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c256$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs256$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c512$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs512$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c1024$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs1024$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c1025$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs1025$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'c2048$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'cs2048$'
		'atmel,24c64' does not match 'spd$'
	['onnn,n24s64b', 'atmel,24c64'] is too long
	'onnn,n24s64b' does not match '^(atmel|catalyst|microchip|nxp|ramtron|renesas|rohm|st),(24(c|cs|lc|mac)[0-9]+|spd)$'
	'belling,bl24c16a' was expected
	'onnn,n24s64b' is not one of ['rohm,br24g01', 'rohm,br24t01']
	'onnn,n24s64b' is not one of ['nxp,se97b', 'renesas,r1ex24002']
	'onnn,n24s64b' is not one of ['onnn,cat24c04', 'onnn,cat24c05', 'rohm,br24g04']
	'renesas,r1ex24016' was expected
	'giantec,gt24c32a' was expected
	'onnn,n24s64b' is not one of ['renesas,r1ex24128', 'samsung,s524ad0xd1']
	'onnn,n24s64b' does not match '^atmel,24c(32|64)d-wl$'
	'atmel,24c16' was expected
	'atmel,24c01' was expected
	'atmel,24c02' was expected
	'atmel,24c04' was expected
	'atmel,24c32' was expected
	'atmel,24c128' was expected
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/eeprom/at24.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dtb: eeprom@50: Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('compatible' was unexpected)
	from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/eeprom/at24.yaml#
arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx93-kontron-bl-osm-s.dtb: /soc@0/bus@44000000/i2c@44340000/eeprom@50: failed to match any schema with compatible: ['onnn,n24s64b', 'atmel,24c64']

Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 0/5] Add support for Kontron OSM-S i.MX93 SoM and carrier board

[Mark Brown]

On Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:40:30 +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> Patch 1-2: small DT binding fixups
> Patch 3: board DT bindings
> Patch 4: support PMIC driver without IRQ
> Patch 5: add devicetrees
> 
> Changes for v2:
> * remove applied patches 1 and 2
> * add tags
> * improvements suggested by Krzysztof (thanks!)
> * add missing Makefile entry for DT
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[2/5] dt-bindings: regulator: pca9450: Make interrupt optional
      commit: ef0b29e744965e8abc14260503a559366219035c
[4/5] regulator: pca9450: Make IRQ optional
      commit: 83808c54064eef620ad8645dfdcaffe125551532

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>


On Mon, 08 Jul 2024 10:40:31 +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> Describe common "gpio-line-names" property to allow DTs to
> specify names for GPIO lines.
> 
> 

Applied, thanks!

[1/5] dt-bindings: gpio: vf610: Allow gpio-line-names to be set
      commit: 8060be2489f9bfa0c603373fa71cc2f93e46e462

Best regards,
-- 
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org>