Re: [RFC v2 10/39] gpio: add HAS_IOPORT dependencies

[Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2022-04-29 at 10:32 -0400, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 03:50:16PM +0200, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them.
> > 
> > Co-developed-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@linux.ibm.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > index 45764ec3b2eb..14e5998ee95c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig
> > @@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ config GPIO_VR41XX
> >  
> >  config GPIO_VX855
> >  	tristate "VIA VX855/VX875 GPIO"
> > -	depends on (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) && PCI
> > +	depends on (X86 || COMPILE_TEST) && PCI && HAS_IOPORT
> >  	select MFD_CORE
> >  	select MFD_VX855
> >  	help
> > -- 
> > 2.32.0
> 
> I noticed a number of other GPIO drivers make use of inb()/outb() -- for
> example the PC104 drivers -- should the respective Kconfigs for those
> drivers also be adjusted here?
> 
> William Breathitt Gray

Good question. As far as I can see most (all?) of these have "select
ISA_BUS_API" which is "def_bool ISA". Now "config ISA" seems to
currently be repeated in architectures and doesn't have an explicit
HAS_IOPORT dependency (it maybe should have one). But it does only make
sense on architectures with HAS_IOPORT set.