Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] dt-bindings: pinctrl: intel: Add for new SoC

["Tanwar, Rahul" <rahul.tanwar@linux.intel.com>]

On 6/11/2019 6:24 PM, Tanwar, Rahul wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> Thanks for the feedback.
>
> On 6/11/2019 5:29 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> +      bias-pull-up:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Specifies pull-up configuration.
>> Isn't this boolean?
>>
>>> +
>>> +      bias-pull-down:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Specifies pull-down configuration.
>> And this?
>>
>> Though looks like sometimes it has a value? Pull strength I guess.
>>
>>> +
>>> +      drive-strength:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Enables driver-current.
>>> +
>>> +      slew-rate:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Enables slew-rate.
>>> +
>>> +      drive-open-drain:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Specifies open-drain configuration.
>> boolean?
>>
>>> +
>>> +      output-enable:
>>> +        $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
>>> +        description: Specifies if the pin is to be configured as output.
>> boolean?
>>
>> But really, all of these should have a common schema defining the types 
>> and only put any additional constraints here.
> Yes, you are right. These are all boolean types.
> All these are standard properties & we are using them with no
> additional constraintsi.e conforming to how they are already
> documented in pinctrl-bindings.txt. Shall ijust omit documenting
> these properties here in driver bindings ?
>
>>> +
>>> +examples:
>>> +  # Pinmux controller node
>>> +  - |
>>> +    pinctrl: pinctrl@e2880000 {
>>> +          compatible = "intel,lgm-pinctrl";
>>> +          reg = <0xe2880000 0x100000>;
>>> +
>>> +          # Client device subnode
>>> +          uart0:uart0 {
>> space              ^
> Just to be sure, you mean space misalignment at below
> line <65>; /* UART_TX0 */ ?Or is it something else ?

Please ignore this query of mine. I now realize  that you meant space
between alias name & node name i.e. uart0: uart0 {. I will fix it in
nextpatch version. Thanks.

>>> +                pins = <64>, /* UART_RX0 */
>>> +                             <65>; /* UART_TX0 */
>>> +                function = "CONSOLE_UART0";
>>> +                pinmux = <1>,
>>> +                         <1>;
>>> +                groups = "CONSOLE_UART0";
>>> +          };
>>> +    };
>>> +
>>> +...
>>> -- 
>>> 2.11.0
>>>
> Regards,
> Rahul