Linux GPIO subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Peng Fan (OSS)" <peng.fan@oss.nxp.com>
Cc: Frank.Li@kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 11/13] gpio: mxc: add dev_err_probe() for error paths to help diagnostics
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 12:04:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167210@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v6-11-cb47ce2ad758@nxp.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] gpio: mxc: race condition exposes uninitialized irq_domain to consumers
- [Low] gpio: mxc: missing dev_err_probe() on clk and irq_count error paths
--

commit 7b3e39d56ce16597ec573873f31010421e588a2f
Author: Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>

    gpio: mxc: add dev_err_probe() for error paths to help diagnostics

This commit replaces bare returns with dev_err_probe() across the probe error
paths for consistent diagnostics and deferred-probe support.

>     Replace bare return statements with dev_err_probe() across all probe
>     error paths for consistent diagnostics and deferred-probe support.

[Severity: Low]
Is this description accurate?

Looking at mxc_gpio_probe(), bare returns for platform_irq_count() and
devm_clk_get_optional_enabled() are still present:

	irq_count = platform_irq_count(pdev);
	if (irq_count < 0)
		return irq_count;

	...

	port->clk = devm_clk_get_optional_enabled(dev, NULL);
	if (IS_ERR(port->clk))
		return PTR_ERR(port->clk);

Unlike platform_get_irq() or devm_platform_ioremap_resource(), neither of
these functions logs errors or handles probe deferrals internally via
dev_err_probe().

If they fail or defer, the failure might propagate silently without being
recorded in the deferred-probe debugfs list.

Does the commit message need to be updated, or should dev_err_probe() be
added to these error paths?

> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> index 09acb186c84c1..2847304640f17 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -536,11 +536,11 @@ static int mxc_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  
>  	err = devm_gpiochip_add_data(dev, &port->gen_gc.gc, port);
>  	if (err)
> -		return err;
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, err, "Failed to add gpiochip data\n");

[Severity: Medium]
Could this expose an uninitialized irq_domain to consumers?

devm_gpiochip_add_data() exposes the GPIO chip to the system. If a consumer
immediately attempts to translate a GPIO to an IRQ via gpiod_to_irq(),
mxc_gpio_to_irq() is invoked.

This creates a narrow window where mxc_gpio_to_irq() can be called before
devm_irq_domain_instantiate() initializes port->domain.

If this happens, mxc_gpio_to_irq() will pass a NULL domain to
irq_find_mapping():

drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c:mxc_gpio_to_irq() {
	...
	return irq_find_mapping(port->domain, offset);
}

This can result in the consumer getting an incorrect IRQ mapping or a
permanent -ENXIO failure from gpiod_to_irq(), leading to a permanent
probe failure instead of -EPROBE_DEFER.

Could we instantiate the irq_domain before adding the GPIO chip?

>  
>  	irq_base = devm_irq_alloc_descs(dev, -1, 0, 32, numa_node_id());
>  	if (irq_base < 0)
> -		return irq_base;
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, irq_base, "Failed to alloc irq desc\n");

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011-gpio-mxc-cleanup-v6-0-cb47ce2ad758@nxp.com?part=11

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-11 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-11 11:51 [PATCH v6 00/13] gpio: mxc: bug fixes and probe cleanup Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] gpio: mxc: fix race between chained IRQ handler install and probe completion Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 12:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  4:14     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] gpio: mxc: fix both_edges bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:18   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12  9:52     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] gpio: mxc: fix wakeup_pads " Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:15   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12  9:51     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 10:30       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12 11:41         ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 18:25           ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] gpio: mxc: use irq_set_irq_wake() to simplify code Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] gpio: mxc: use for_each_set_bit() to iterate wakeup pads Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:19   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12  9:53     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] gpio: mxc: replace of_device_is_compatible() with hwdata flags Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:25   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12  9:59     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 10:32       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] gpio: mxc: convert pad wakeup compatible checks to " Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:27   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12 10:01     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 14:31       ` Frank Li
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] gpio: mxc: use local dev variable Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:30   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12 10:05     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 10:39       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12 11:52         ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] gpio: mxc: use cleanup guard for pm_runtime_get_noresume() balance Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-12  9:38   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-12 10:10     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-12 10:41       ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] gpio: mxc: use devres functions simplify probe code Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 12:05   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12  4:12     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] gpio: mxc: add dev_err_probe() for error paths to help diagnostics Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 12:04   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12  4:13     ` Peng Fan
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] gpio: mxc: introduce MXC_ICR macros and use field_prep/field_get Peng Fan (OSS)
2026-10-11 11:51 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] gpio: mxc: use BIT() macro for single-bit operations Peng Fan (OSS)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167210@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peng.fan@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox