From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: phucduc.bui@gmail.com
Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Propagate reset GPIO errors
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 02:01:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167547@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012015433.6155-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] pinctrl: mcp23s08: multi-device probe failure due to duplicate reset GPIO request
--
commit 95196894afec909a218e9bd99fc8884c93869fc7
Author: bui duc phuc <phucduc.bui@gmail.com>
pinctrl: mcp23s08: Propagate reset GPIO errors
This commit adds a check for the return value of devm_gpiod_get_optional() in
mcp23s08_probe_one() to propagate errors instead of ignoring them.
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c
> index cc668f84bf8bc..259ac02134c64 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08.c
> @@ -613,6 +613,9 @@ int mcp23s08_probe_one(struct mcp23s08 *mcp, struct device *dev,
> mcp->chip.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> mcp->reset_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "reset", GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> + if (IS_ERR(mcp->reset_gpio))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(mcp->reset_gpio),
> + "failed to get reset GPIO\n");
[Severity: High]
Does this cause a regression for multi-chip SPI configurations by aborting the
probe due to -EBUSY?
In the SPI driver, multiple physical chips can share a single SPI chip select.
This is handled in drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:mcp23s08_probe() by
iterating over spi_present_mask and calling mcp23s08_probe_one() for each:
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-mcp23s08_spi.c:mcp23s08_probe() {
...
for_each_set_bit(addr, &spi_present_mask, MCP_MAX_DEV_PER_CS) {
...
ret = mcp23s08_probe_one(data->mcp[addr], dev, MCP23S08_SPI_BASE | (addr << 1),
info->type, -1);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
}
...
}
Because all logical chips share the same SPI device, the same struct device
*dev pointer is passed to every mcp23s08_probe_one() call.
During the first iteration, the reset GPIO is successfully requested
exclusively.
During the second iteration, devm_gpiod_get_optional() is called again on the
same dev pointer for the same "reset" connection ID. The GPIO core will
attempt to request the same descriptor again, which will return -EBUSY because
it is already requested and does not use GPIOD_FLAGS_BIT_NONEXCLUSIVE.
Prior to this patch, the -EBUSY error was ignored, allowing the second and
subsequent chips to probe successfully (which was safe since the reset line
was already asserted and deasserted by the first chip).
>
> /* verify MCP_IOCON.SEQOP = 0, so sequential reads work,
> * and MCP_IOCON.HAEN = 1, so we work with all chips.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012015433.6155-1-phucduc.bui@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 2:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 1:54 [PATCH v2] pinctrl: mcp23s08: Propagate reset GPIO errors phucduc.bui
2026-10-12 2:01 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 5:53 ` Bui Duc Phuc
2026-10-12 8:04 ` Linus Walleij
2026-10-12 8:28 ` Bui Duc Phuc
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167547@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=phucduc.bui@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox