From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Fil Dunsky" <filipp.dunsky@gmail.com>
Cc: robh@kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] watchdog: Add ARM TWD (MPCore private) watchdog driver
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2026 17:47:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-168493@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261012-b4-cs75xx-s2-v1-7-8a7641b7b79c@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] watchdog: arm_twd_wdt: premature reset due to ignored prescaler update
--
commit f10545beccf6bb20bb2cd3eed188125eef8d1afc
Author: Fil Dunsky <filipp.dunsky@gmail.com>
watchdog: Add ARM TWD (MPCore private) watchdog driver
This commit introduces a watchdog driver for ARM Cortex-A5/A9 and ARM11 MPCore
systems. It programs, pings, and stops the watchdogs of all online CPUs, and
takes over the hardware if it is found already running from the bootloader.
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/arm_twd_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/arm_twd_wdt.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..1931e9a39655c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/arm_twd_wdt.c
[ ... ]
> +static u32 twd_wdt_ticks(struct twd_wdt *wdt, unsigned int secs)
> +{
> + u64 ticks = div_u64((u64)wdt->rate * secs, TWD_WDT_PRESCALE + 1);
[Severity: High]
Does this calculation always match the actual hardware prescaler?
The timeout calculation strictly assumes the prescaler was successfully
updated to TWD_WDT_PRESCALE. If the prescaler update fails, this causes
a huge mismatch in the expected timeout.
> +
> + return min_t(u64, ticks, U32_MAX);
> +}
[ ... ]
> +/* The following run on the CPU whose watchdog they access */
> +static void twd_wdt_cpu_start(void *data)
> +{
> + struct twd_wdt *wdt = data;
> +
> + /*
> + * Load the counter before enabling, it may still be zero. A watchdog
> + * that is already running is reloaded and keeps running, the mode bit
> + * cannot be cleared by writing the control register.
> + */
> + writel(twd_wdt_ticks(wdt, wdt->wdd.timeout), wdt->base + TWD_WDT_LOAD);
> + writel(FIELD_PREP(TWD_WDT_CTRL_PRESCALER, TWD_WDT_PRESCALE) |
> + TWD_WDT_CTRL_WD_MODE | TWD_WDT_CTRL_ENABLE,
> + wdt->base + TWD_WDT_CONTROL);
[Severity: High]
Can this write fail to update the prescaler if the watchdog is already
running?
According to the ARM Cortex-A9 MPCore TRM, writes to the prescaler field in
the Control Register are ignored if the timer is already in watchdog mode.
Since the driver takes over a running watchdog without stopping it first via
the disable keys, the hardware retains the bootloader's prescaler.
If the bootloader set a smaller prescaler (e.g., 0), the timer counts down
much faster than calculated above, leading to a premature system reset
shortly after the driver probes.
> +}
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261012-b4-cs75xx-s2-v1-0-8a7641b7b79c@gmail.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-12 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 17:32 [PATCH 00/11] Cortina Systems CS75xx: interrupt controller, GPIO, I2C and TWD watchdog Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 01/11] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: Add Cortina Systems CS7542 peripheral interrupt controller Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 02/11] irqchip: Add Cortina Systems CS75xx " Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 03/11] dt-bindings: gpio: Add Cortina Systems CS7542 GPIO controller Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:32 ` [PATCH 04/11] gpio: Add Cortina Systems CS75xx GPIO driver Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 20:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2026-10-12 20:57 ` Fil Dunsky
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 05/11] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Cortina Systems CS7542 I2C controller Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 06/11] i2c: Add Cortina Systems CS75xx I2C controller driver Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 07/11] watchdog: Add ARM TWD (MPCore private) watchdog driver Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:47 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: dts: cortina: cs7542: Add interrupt controller, GPIO and I2C Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: dts: cortina: almondplus: Add reset button and enable I2C Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable Cortina Systems CS75xx GPIO, I2C and TWD watchdog Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 17:33 ` [PATCH 11/11] MAINTAINERS: Add Cortina Systems CS75xx interrupt controller, GPIO and I2C Fil Dunsky via B4 Relay
2026-10-12 18:48 ` [PATCH 00/11] Cortina Systems CS75xx: interrupt controller, GPIO, I2C and TWD watchdog Conor Dooley
2026-10-13 7:10 ` Fil Dunsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-168493@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=filipp.dunsky@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox