From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Bartosz Golaszewski" <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] gpio: shared: generalize most code to firmware nodes
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 2026 14:15:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-197416@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261104-fwnode-for-each-prop-v1-9-6e28fe1c72c4@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Low] gpio: shared: unused gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse() when CONFIG_OF=n
--
commit 6eeb937e478380a7cc0f030271074c97cd8b7361
Author: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com>
gpio: shared: generalize most code to firmware nodes
This commit converts the device-tree scanning code in gpiolib-shared.c to
use generic fwnode APIs and restricts the CONFIG_OF preprocessor guard to
gpio_shared_of_scan().
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
> index 8c9ac9d933049..58ac049bb603e 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-shared.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -292,19 +297,35 @@ static int gpio_shared_of_traverse(struct device_node *curr)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int gpio_shared_of_scan(void)
> +static int gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse(struct fwnode_handle *curr)
> {
> - if (of_root)
> - return gpio_shared_of_traverse(of_root);
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (gpio_shared_fwnode_ignore(curr))
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = gpio_shared_fwnode_scan_properties(curr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + fwnode_for_each_child_node_scoped(curr, child) {
> + ret = gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse(child);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + }
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#else
> +
> static int gpio_shared_of_scan(void)
> {
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)
> + if (of_root)
> + return gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse(of_fwnode_handle(of_root));
> +#endif
> +
> return 0;
> }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_OF */
[Severity: Low]
When building with CONFIG_GPIO_SHARED=y and CONFIG_OF=n (for example, under
CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=y), the only non-recursive caller of
gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse() in gpio_shared_of_scan() is preprocessed out.
Does this trigger a -Wunused-function compiler warning for
gpio_shared_fwnode_traverse() unless it is marked __maybe_unused?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261104-fwnode-for-each-prop-v1-0-6e28fe1c72c4@oss.qualcomm.com?part=9
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-04 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-04 14:03 [PATCH 0/9] gpio: make gpiolib-shared more fwnode-centric Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 1/9] device property: fix fwnode_name_eq() for empty node names Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 2/9] lib: string_helpers: implement a CLASS() for string arrays Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/9] fwnode: define the property_get_names() operation Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 4/9] device property: provide fwnode_property_get_names() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:12 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/9] of: property: implement the .property_get_names() fwnode operation Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 6/9] fwnode: define the count_references() " Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 7/9] device property: provide fwnode_property_count_references() Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 8/9] of: property: implement the count_references() fwnode operation Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 15:33 ` Rob Herring
2026-11-04 14:03 ` [PATCH 9/9] gpio: shared: generalize most code to firmware nodes Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-11-04 14:15 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-197416@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bartosz.golaszewski@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox