From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Sailer Subject: Re: soundmodem patches for various distros? Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:22:22 +0100 Message-ID: <1229271742.29241.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <49445246.4050104@columbia.edu> <20081214010857.GP30968@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081214010857.GP30968@mea-ext.zmailer.org> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Matti Aarnio Cc: Alan Crosswell , linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 2008-12-14 at 03:08 +0200, Matti Aarnio wrote: > No, they are not. If Tom does not collect updates, then they > have divergent evolution.. Ok, a first attempt at collecting patches (from debian and fedora) http://www.baycom.org/~tom/ham/soundmodem/soundmodem-0.11.tar.gz > If you have to have some "standard way" to configure, try Java Properties, > which are lines like this: > > keyword \s+ parameters How exactly would you represent a tree in a non sucking way with this format? soundmodem is essentially a tree where each node (not only leaves) can have properties - sounds like xml to me. And it's not that xml cannot be typed into a standard text editor... Also, the graphical configurator is not only a configurator, it allows you to also display scope like curves. For this, X seems natural - I'm not going to port this to aalib 8-) 73, Tom