* [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information.
@ 2022-08-02 15:07 Francois Romieu
2022-08-02 16:57 ` Bernard f6bvp
2022-08-06 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francois Romieu @ 2022-08-02 15:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni, f6bvp, thomas, thomas, linux-hams
rose /proc code does not serialize timer accesses.
Initial report by Bernard F6BVP Pidoux exhibits overflow amounting
to 116 ticks on its HZ=250 system.
Full timer access serialization would imho be overkill as rose /proc
does not enforce consistency between displayed ROSE_STATE_XYZ and
timer values during changes of state.
The patch may also fix similar behavior in ax25 /proc, ax25 ioctl
and netrom /proc as they all exhibit the same timer serialization
policy. This point has not been reported though.
The sole remaining use of ax25_display_timer - ax25 rtt valuation -
may also perform marginally better but I have not analyzed it too
deeply.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d5e93cc7-a91f-13d3-49a1-b50c11f0f811@free.fr/
---
net/ax25/ax25_timer.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Bernard, can you formally test and add your "Tested-by:" on this one ?
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c b/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
index 85865ebfdfa2..9f7cb0a7c73f 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
@@ -108,10 +108,12 @@ int ax25_t1timer_running(ax25_cb *ax25)
unsigned long ax25_display_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
{
+ long delta = timer->expires - jiffies;
+
if (!timer_pending(timer))
return 0;
- return timer->expires - jiffies;
+ return max(0L, delta);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ax25_display_timer);
--
2.37.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information.
2022-08-02 15:07 [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information Francois Romieu
@ 2022-08-02 16:57 ` Bernard f6bvp
2022-08-06 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Bernard f6bvp @ 2022-08-02 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francois Romieu, netdev
Cc: edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni, thomas, thomas, linux-hams
rose /proc code does not serialize timer accesses.
Initial report by Bernard F6BVP Pidoux exhibits overflow amounting
to 116 ticks on its HZ=250 system.
Full timer access serialization would imho be overkill as rose /proc
does not enforce consistency between displayed ROSE_STATE_XYZ and
timer values during changes of state.
The patch may also fix similar behavior in ax25 /proc, ax25 ioctl
and netrom /proc as they all exhibit the same timer serialization
policy. This point has not been reported though.
The sole remaining use of ax25_display_timer - ax25 rtt valuation -
may also perform marginally better but I have not analyzed it too
deeply.
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Tested-by: Bernard Pidoux <f6bvp@free.fr>
Cc: Thomas DL9SAU Osterried <thomas@osterried.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/d5e93cc7-a91f-13d3-49a1-b50c11f0f811@free.fr/
---
net/ax25/ax25_timer.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Bernard, can you formally test and add your "Tested-by:" on this one ?
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c b/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
index 85865ebfdfa2..9f7cb0a7c73f 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_timer.c
@@ -108,10 +108,12 @@ int ax25_t1timer_running(ax25_cb *ax25)
unsigned long ax25_display_timer(struct timer_list *timer)
{
+ long delta = timer->expires - jiffies;
+
if (!timer_pending(timer))
return 0;
- return timer->expires - jiffies;
+ return max(0L, delta);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(ax25_display_timer);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information.
2022-08-02 15:07 [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information Francois Romieu
2022-08-02 16:57 ` Bernard f6bvp
@ 2022-08-06 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-08-06 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Francois Romieu
Cc: netdev, edumazet, davem, kuba, pabeni, f6bvp, thomas, thomas,
linux-hams
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Tue, 2 Aug 2022 17:07:42 +0200 you wrote:
> rose /proc code does not serialize timer accesses.
>
> Initial report by Bernard F6BVP Pidoux exhibits overflow amounting
> to 116 ticks on its HZ=250 system.
>
> Full timer access serialization would imho be overkill as rose /proc
> does not enforce consistency between displayed ROSE_STATE_XYZ and
> timer values during changes of state.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [v1,net,1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information.
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net/c/df1c941468fc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-08-06 2:10 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-08-02 15:07 [PATCH v1 net 1/1] net: avoid overflow when rose /proc displays timer information Francois Romieu
2022-08-02 16:57 ` Bernard f6bvp
2022-08-06 2:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).