From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: PARPORT 9k6 modem & kernel 2.4.18
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 08:37:34 +0100
Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org
Message-ID: <20020426083734.O25081@redhat.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204261018460.7924-100000@zl2bsj.ampr.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jFijuCULRDbBA23d"
Return-path: <linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204261018460.7924-100000@zl2bsj.ampr.org>; from zl2bsj@zl2tze.myip.org on Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:27:33AM +1200
List-Id: <linux-hams.vger.kernel.org>
To: Wilbert Knol <zl2bsj@zl2tze.myip.org>
Cc: linux-hams <linux-hams@vger.kernel.org>, w.knol@niwa.cri.nz


--jFijuCULRDbBA23d
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, Apr 26, 2002 at 10:27:33AM +1200, Wilbert Knol wrote:

>=20
> I can confirm James's story.
>=20
> After upgrading from kernel 2.4.8 (Mdk 8.1) to 2.4.18 (Mdk 8.2), my
> parport 9k6 BayCom modem no longer works.

If you use 2.4.19-pre7, does the problem go away?  There were some
parport fixes after 2.4.18 I think.

Tim.
*/

--jFijuCULRDbBA23d
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE8yQO9yaXy9qA00+cRAsD4AKCaq/amPxDwFq6/cegQLPbpSF4gaACdFcbe
BWn9FGnSPgqSE+KiaugG+zE=
=i1KD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jFijuCULRDbBA23d--