From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small) Subject: Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6 Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 08:43:48 +1000 Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20020728224348.GG10796@eye-net.com.au> References: <20020726134216.A4126@dea.linux-mips.net> <20020726232426.GB18207@eye-net.com.au> <20020727030700.A32364@dea.linux-mips.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020727030700.A32364@dea.linux-mips.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Ralf Baechle DO1GRB Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 27, 2002 at 03:07:00AM +0200, Ralf Baechle DO1GRB wrote: > At the moment I just intend to dust off the code. Anything else we can > talk about later. Unless there is already a list of bugs or wishes? If you're looking for something later, you may want to solve the ancient "why does an AX.25 interface need an IP address" question. The answer used to be "because it does", I'm not sure if that is still the case, I've got ports sitting on a Linux computer over *there* (points to rowlf) that don't have IP addresses or have 0.0.0.0 - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5 Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ MIEEE Debian developer