From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
To: Iain Young - G7III <g7iii@g7iii.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:50:57 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020730105057.GC7293@eye-net.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020729185037.GA684@columbia.g7iii.bogus>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Iain Young - G7III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
>
> > Oh, by the way. Has anyone done anything with the NEW-AX.25 patch lately?
> > I think it has some potential but unfortunately seems it's now completely
> > unmaintained.
>
> I haven't, but I do have a request if anyone decides to 'Take Up The
> Challenge".
>
> Currently (IIRC), the patch routes all IP traffic destined for radio
> links (44/8) down the ipax0 device, and then decides the best layer 2
> (AX25) interface to throw it out.
>
> I _personally_ believe that this is not the way it should be, I don't
> actually like this, but unfortunatley the ipax0 device actually
> encapsulates the IP packet, and puts the AX25 header on etc..
I think that's actually a very interesting idea myself. Very interesting to
have the AX.25 stuff sitting down in layer 2 and the IP sitting on a
different interface. It sounds a lot like Linux bridges which have a
br0 interface, you might even be able to nick that code.
This is my set of interfaces on my firewall bridge:
/sbin/ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
inet6 ::1/128 scope host
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:50:bf:7a:05:88 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::250:bfff:fe7a:588/10 scope link
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:50:ba:88:b4:8e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet6 fe80::250:baff:fe88:b48e/10 scope link
4: gre0@NONE: <NOARP> mtu 1476 qdisc noop
link/gre 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
5: sit0@NONE: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
8: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
link/ether 00:50:ba:88:b4:8e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 172.16.42.22/24 brd 172.16.42.255 scope global br0
inet6 fe80::250:baff:fe88:b48e/10 scope link
Ignore the IPv6 (inet6) addresses, you can see eth0 and eth1 have no IP
address but there is a br0 interface which does.
Of course I bet noone thinks running spanning tree over radio is a good
idea :)
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-30 10:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-26 11:42 Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6 Ralf Baechle
2002-07-26 12:16 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-26 12:50 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-09-27 16:36 ` mkiss problem in kernel 2.5 Arnau Sánchez
2002-07-26 12:50 ` Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6 Steven Whitehouse
2002-07-26 18:15 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-26 23:24 ` Craig Small
2002-07-27 1:07 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-27 11:10 ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-27 13:38 ` Ken Koster
2002-07-28 13:15 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-28 17:19 ` Riley Williams
2002-07-30 8:24 ` Jason Flynn G7OCD
2002-07-28 19:10 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-07-28 22:43 ` Craig Small
2002-07-29 12:16 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 18:50 ` Iain Young - G7III
2002-07-30 9:44 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-31 17:53 ` Iain Young - G7III
2002-08-01 22:10 ` Ken Koster
2002-07-30 10:50 ` Craig Small [this message]
2002-07-29 20:43 ` Chuck Gelm
2002-07-29 14:49 ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-29 15:27 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 17:45 ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-29 18:07 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-07-30 8:14 ` Jason Flynn G7OCD
2002-07-30 9:38 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 20:52 ` Chuck Gelm
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-29 23:44 Stewart Wilkinson
2002-07-30 9:14 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020730105057.GC7293@eye-net.com.au \
--to=csmall@eye-net.com.au \
--cc=g7iii@g7iii.demon.co.uk \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox