Linux HAM/Amateur Radio development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
To: Iain Young - G7III <g7iii@g7iii.demon.co.uk>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 20:50:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020730105057.GC7293@eye-net.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020729185037.GA684@columbia.g7iii.bogus>

On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 07:50:37PM +0100, Iain Young - G7III wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 03:16:32PM +0300, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
> 
> > Oh, by the way. Has anyone done anything with the NEW-AX.25 patch lately?
> > I think it has some potential but unfortunately seems it's now completely
> > unmaintained.
> 
> I haven't, but I do have a request if anyone decides to 'Take Up The 
> Challenge".
> 
> Currently (IIRC), the patch routes all IP traffic destined for radio
> links (44/8) down the ipax0 device, and then decides the best layer 2
> (AX25) interface to throw it out.
> 
> I _personally_ believe that this is not the way it should be, I don't
> actually like this, but unfortunatley the ipax0 device actually
> encapsulates the IP packet, and puts the AX25 header on etc..
I think that's actually a very interesting idea myself.  Very interesting to 
have the AX.25 stuff sitting down in layer 2 and the IP sitting on a
different interface.  It sounds a lot like Linux bridges which have a
br0 interface, you might even be able to nick that code.

This is my set of interfaces on my firewall bridge:

 /sbin/ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 16436 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
    inet6 ::1/128 scope host
2: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ether 00:50:bf:7a:05:88 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::250:bfff:fe7a:588/10 scope link
3: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,PROMISC,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ether 00:50:ba:88:b4:8e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet6 fe80::250:baff:fe88:b48e/10 scope link
4: gre0@NONE: <NOARP> mtu 1476 qdisc noop
    link/gre 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
5: sit0@NONE: <NOARP> mtu 1480 qdisc noop
    link/sit 0.0.0.0 brd 0.0.0.0
8: br0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc noqueue
    link/ether 00:50:ba:88:b4:8e brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 172.16.42.22/24 brd 172.16.42.255 scope global br0
    inet6 fe80::250:baff:fe88:b48e/10 scope link

Ignore the IPv6 (inet6) addresses, you can see eth0 and eth1 have no IP
address but there is a br0 interface which does.

Of course I bet noone thinks running spanning tree over radio is a good
idea :)

  - Craig
-- 
Craig Small VK2XLZ  GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE  95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/        <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org>                 Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-07-30 10:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-07-26 11:42 Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6 Ralf Baechle
2002-07-26 12:16 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-26 12:50   ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-09-27 16:36     ` mkiss problem in kernel 2.5 Arnau Sánchez
2002-07-26 12:50 ` Status of AX.25 in 2.5 / 2.6 Steven Whitehouse
2002-07-26 18:15   ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-26 23:24 ` Craig Small
2002-07-27  1:07   ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-27 11:10     ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-27 13:38       ` Ken Koster
2002-07-28 13:15         ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-07-28 17:19           ` Riley Williams
2002-07-30  8:24           ` Jason Flynn G7OCD
2002-07-28 19:10     ` Tomi Manninen
2002-07-28 22:43     ` Craig Small
2002-07-29 12:16       ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 18:50         ` Iain Young - G7III
2002-07-30  9:44           ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-31 17:53             ` Iain Young - G7III
2002-08-01 22:10               ` Ken Koster
2002-07-30 10:50           ` Craig Small [this message]
2002-07-29 20:43         ` Chuck Gelm
2002-07-29 14:49 ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-29 15:27   ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 17:45     ` Robert Jenkins
2002-07-29 18:07       ` Tomi Manninen
2002-07-30  8:14         ` Jason Flynn G7OCD
2002-07-30  9:38           ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-07-29 20:52   ` Chuck Gelm
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-29 23:44 Stewart Wilkinson
2002-07-30  9:14 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20020730105057.GC7293@eye-net.com.au \
    --to=csmall@eye-net.com.au \
    --cc=g7iii@g7iii.demon.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox