From: Ralf Baechle DO1GRB <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Tomi Manninen OH2BNS <tpm@prkele.tky.hut.fi>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ax25 kernel problem sometimes accur
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 13:30:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20021211133016.A14287@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.HPX.4.10.10212111219220.22086-100000@saturn.trs.ntc.nokia.com>; from tpm@prkele.tky.hut.fi on Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:29:12PM +0200
On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:29:12PM +0200, Tomi Manninen OH2BNS wrote:
> Ok, I understand. Anyway some kind of progress report would be nice. Even
> something like: "don't hold your breath", if that is appropriate... :-)
Holding breath is definately something that could negativly impact your
health ;-)
> I have gotten surprisingly many private queries about this lately, so to
> recap what I have understood so far: the 2.4 code is bad, full of races,
> works only if treated nicely. Your SOCKOPS_WRAP removal obviously makes
> things even worse until you redo the locking stuff. When that is done we
> have a perfect ax.25 stack again. Right? ;-)
In some sense the improments that are necessary to make the AX.25 stack
"future proof" are ridiculous. AX.25 is about the worst protocol design
I've ran over in my life, so making a multi-threaded implementation of it
is an amusing thought. But the other legacy protocols like Appletalk
are going through the same pain ...
73 de DO1GRB op Ralf
--
Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-11 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-04 7:21 ax25 kernel problem sometimes accur Tihomir Heidelberg
2002-12-04 11:04 ` Sandor Dibuz
2002-12-04 20:20 ` Tihomir Heidelberg
2002-12-04 21:54 ` Kjell Jarl
2002-12-05 1:16 ` M Taylor
2002-12-05 14:43 ` Tihomir Heidelberg
2002-12-04 19:42 ` Stewart Wilkinson
2002-12-07 1:10 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-12-07 19:32 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-07 23:39 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-12-10 14:09 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-12-11 1:40 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB
2002-12-11 10:29 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-12-11 12:30 ` Ralf Baechle DO1GRB [this message]
2002-12-11 13:36 ` mvw
2002-12-11 15:32 ` Jeroen Vreeken
2002-12-11 17:56 ` Curt Mills, WE7U
2002-12-11 21:57 ` Success! TWO questions remain mvw
2002-12-12 13:16 ` mvw
2002-12-12 13:28 ` Hamish Moffatt
2002-12-12 15:25 ` Margaret Leber
2002-12-12 17:27 ` Curt Mills, WE7U
2002-12-12 17:36 ` Kelly Black
2002-12-12 18:21 ` And another question Michael Willems
2002-12-12 21:14 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-19 0:09 ` BBS - recommendations? mvw
2002-12-19 3:59 ` Michael Melanson
2002-12-12 21:44 ` Success! TWO questions remain Hamish Moffatt
2002-12-12 17:34 ` Ken Koster
2002-12-12 20:54 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-12 21:45 ` Hamish Moffatt
2002-12-13 3:12 ` Jack Zielke
2002-12-14 15:35 ` listen, permissions mvw
2002-12-14 15:43 ` Luc Langehegermann
2002-12-14 15:59 ` mvw
2002-12-14 17:48 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-14 16:07 ` Dennis Boone
2002-12-16 18:36 ` Curt Mills, WE7U
2002-12-24 5:15 ` Simple BBS, again, sorry for asking twice mvw
2002-12-24 6:54 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-24 21:43 ` mvw
2002-12-25 2:11 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-25 3:55 ` mvw
2002-12-25 4:36 ` fbb compile mvw
2002-12-25 5:13 ` FBB mvw
2002-12-25 9:14 ` FBB Cees Tool
2002-12-25 10:23 ` FBB Joop Stakenborg
2002-12-25 14:54 ` FBB mvw
2002-12-25 23:08 ` FBB Joop Stakenborg
2002-12-26 19:13 ` FBB... any more help? mvw
2002-12-26 23:21 ` Chuck Gelm
2002-12-27 0:05 ` mvw
2002-12-27 2:50 ` Chuck Gelm
2002-12-25 20:01 ` FBB mvw
2002-12-25 21:31 ` FBB Cees Tool
2002-12-25 22:02 ` FBB mvw
2002-12-25 22:38 ` FBB Cees Tool
2002-12-25 22:05 ` FBB... (follow up) mvw
2002-12-25 22:11 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-26 4:12 ` mvw
2002-12-25 22:34 ` FBB Tomi Manninen
2002-12-25 22:45 ` FBB Joop Stakenborg
2002-12-25 21:18 ` FBB Tomi Manninen
2002-12-25 5:32 ` Simple BBS, again, sorry for asking twice Steve Fraser
2002-12-25 9:30 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-25 21:59 ` Steve Fraser
2002-12-26 0:31 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-26 4:10 ` Bob Nielsen
2002-12-26 10:23 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-25 8:43 ` Kernel compile option? Vivi Kusumo
2002-12-25 20:24 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-29 19:35 ` packet radio indoor Vivi Kusumo
2002-12-29 23:30 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-30 21:48 ` packet radio indoor :-( Vivi Kusumo
2002-12-31 6:55 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-30 2:39 ` packet radio indoor Chuck Gelm
2002-12-27 7:16 ` Simple BBS, again, sorry for asking twice Robin Gilks
2002-12-27 13:50 ` mvw
2002-12-27 17:41 ` ax25 pakcet problem: any ideas? mvw
2002-12-27 19:14 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-27 20:00 ` mvw
2002-12-27 20:14 ` Tomi Manninen
2002-12-30 3:18 ` tcp.ip over ax25, when sent? mvw
2002-12-30 3:24 ` Hamish Moffatt
2002-12-30 3:32 ` Henrique Miranda
2002-12-30 5:28 ` Wilbert Knol
2002-12-30 6:12 ` Bob Nielsen
2002-12-30 6:45 ` Bob Nielsen
2002-12-30 6:58 ` Tomi Manninen OH2BNS
2002-12-30 23:37 ` Bob Nielsen
2002-12-12 17:40 ` Success! TWO questions remain Ken Koster
2002-12-12 18:09 ` Michael Willems
2002-12-12 17:24 ` Curt Mills, WE7U
2002-12-12 14:09 ` cyberdoc
2002-12-17 17:37 ` Thomas Osterried
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20021211133016.A14287@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tpm@prkele.tky.hut.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox