From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Subject: Re: Success! TWO questions remain Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2002 08:45:30 +1100 Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20021212214530.GB12823@silly.cloud.net.au> References: <20021212132801.GA9699@silly.cloud.net.au> <3DF8AA6B.6000303@voicenet.com> <200212120934.49608.n7ipb@koster.seatcp.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200212120934.49608.n7ipb@koster.seatcp.net> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 12, 2002 at 09:34:49AM -0800, Ken Koster wrote: > On Thursday 12 December 2002 07:25, Margaret Leber wrote: > > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > > Compression is still hiding the data and I would say breaks the rules. > > Compression is not breaking the rules and hasn't been for a long time. > NOS, JNOS, FBB and others all use compression for forwarding mail and > it's perfectly legal. We've been doing this now for more than a decade. OK, my mistake. However I was under the impression that the original poster was actually looking for a way to obscure his communications, which the regulations don't allow. > packet sites. While the fact that SSH also encrypts the rest of your > communication besides the password might be considered by some to be That can be disabled. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB