From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hamish Moffatt <hamish@cloud.net.au>
Subject: Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:39:05 +1000
Sender: linux-hams-owner@localhost
Message-ID: <20030408133905.GA23255@silly.cloud.net.au>
References: <E192r69-000HrJ-KE@probity.mcc.ac.uk> <200304080725.16056.w9ya@arrl.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200304080725.16056.w9ya@arrl.net>
List-Id: <linux-hams.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Apr 08, 2003 at 07:25:16AM -0500, w9ya wrote:
> Actually a qt based one should be just as satisfactory. Most desktop machines 
> have both gtk and qt installed to take advantage of programs written for 
> both.

I'd say non-GNOME GTK+ programs are far more common than non-KDE Qt
programs.

Hamish
-- 
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <hamish@debian.org> <hamish@cloud.net.au>