From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jarmo Subject: Re: Timers in 2.6.x kernels Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 08:01:27 +0200 Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <200403140801.27105.oh1mrr@nic.fi> References: <200403121310.02980.oh1mrr@nic.fi> <200403131659.49496.oh1mrr@nic.fi> <20040313220622.GA18544@linux-mips.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20040313220622.GA18544@linux-mips.org> Content-Disposition: inline List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: Ralf Baechle DO1GRB Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Sunday 14 March 2004 00:06, you wrote: > MS drivers and Linux drivers are technically very different. So quite > likely the version numbers are refering to different drivers. And anyway, > the Linux driver has been changed fairly often, just not the version > number of the driver. So in short, the content of information in the > version number is probably approximating that of cosmic noise ;-) True... But also true,that there is no maintainer for 6pack at the moment.. So we here,who use it,are in "liquid"...Want to modernize system, hardware and software, but seems to take some time... In a way this is fun,to try solve problems,but packetradio/cluster users does not feel that way,when everything is crushed most of the time... > > Hope,that get it running more stable..9 hours max uptime was quite > > annoying. 8 hours 14mins...AAARGGHHHH! Still have to remember,that this is a hobby..isn't it? > > Maybe - but software that works less than reliable sucks. > > 73 de DO1GRB op Ralf True,but this case I've started to think,that there sucks my linux skills;-) No...I'm not giving up...Next..... HW change...again.. Jarmo