From: John Coppens <john@jcoppens.com>
To: Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Qsl.net availability
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:12:16 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040414221216.60b54309.john@jcoppens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040414224016.30670.qmail@radagast.org>
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 15:40:16 -0700 (PDT)
Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org> wrote:
> John Coppens <john@jcoppens.com> wrote:
> > Hello people.
> >
> > Since a few months, I cannot connect to www.qsl.net from where I live
> > (Argentina). I can connect with FTP, but not in HTTP (webpages). I can
> > ping www.qsl.net, Not only I can't connect to my own page, but I
> > cannot connect to any of the webpages at QSL.NET.
>
> This site comes up just fine for me, here in California.
Hi Dave... Thanks for replying.
I gathered that other people were not having problems. And I tried to get
the page indirectly - through the w3c validation service, so I know the
server is actually up.
> > I am not ruling out a configuration problem in my Linux machine, but I
> > cannot find out why this is the _only_ site I cannot connect to.
>
> One possibility is that the WWW.QSL.NET server machine is blocking
> TCP connections from your IP address range.
> ...
> I'm sorry to say that Argentina's ISPs are in very bad odor with
> quite a few system administrators in North America. This is due
> to the large number of spammers, spammers' web sites, virus- and
> trojan-horse-infected client systems, "script kiddies" probing
> for security vulnerabilities, etc. found on Argentina's networks,
> and to the apparent unwillingness of the ISPs involved to respond
> to reports of these abuses or to take any visible steps to clean
> up their networks.
I agree, and I could understand the blocking of e-mails up to a certain
point, but I cannot really get why HTTP access is denied (port 80).
> Another possibility is that there's some sort of fairly selective
> routing problem involved. What do you see if you run the command
> "/usr/sbin/traceroute www.qsl.net" from your Linux system?
I think 256 ms isn't that bad considering the long route. Here's the
traceroute output:
1 200.3.62.232 (200.3.62.232) 55.182 ms 54.455 ms 52.888 ms
2 33.39.3.200.telecom.net.ar (200.3.39.33) 54.702 ms 54.404 ms 56.381
ms
3 137.37.3.200.telecom.net.ar (200.3.37.137) 64.321 ms 60.85 ms
64.636 ms
4 93.37.3.200.telecom.net.ar (200.3.37.93) 66.279 ms 67.766
ms 66.221 ms
5 cog01ri-pos16-0-0.tasf.telecom.net.ar (200.3.32.134)
65.934 ms 67.774 ms 66.18 ms
6 bai1-telecom-argentina-2-ar.bai.seabone.net (195.22.220.37) 64.486 ms
64.302 ms 67.876 ms
7 new4-new2-racc1.new.seabone.net (195.22.216.30)
206.869 ms 209.841 ms 207.15 ms
8 500.POS4-0.GW1.EWR6.ALTER.NET (157.130.222.169) 225.093 ms 223.149
ms 228.51 ms
9 0.so-4-0-0.CL2.EWR6.ALTER.NET (152.63.16.86) 230.348 ms
223.489 ms 221.925 ms
10 0.so-1-2-0.XL2.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.13)
218.39 ms 219.988 ms 222.167 ms
11 0.so-7-0-0.BR1.NYC4.ALTER.NET (152.63.21.81) 218.141 ms 218.509 ms
220.205 ms
12 204.255.168.2(204.255.168.2) 218.735 ms 226.79 ms 218.439 ms
13 tbr2-p011601.n54ny.ip.att.net (12.123.3.61) 221.951 ms 223.223 ms
225.202 ms
14 tbr2-cl1.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.10.54) 223.58 ms 235.23
ms 224.955 ms
15 gbr5-p40.wswdc.ip.att.net (12.122.11.186) 228.544 ms 226.64 ms
223.45 ms
16 ar1-p310.btmmd.ip.att.net (12.123.194.65) 227.083 ms 274.468 ms
251.756 ms
17 12.119.70.98 (12.119.70.98) 230.046 ms 228.45 ms 228.579 ms
18 162.33.163.103 (162.33.163.103) 228.351 ms 228.416 ms 231.548 ms
19 162.33.101.253 (162.33.101.253) 240.198 ms 231.899 ms 233.243 ms
20 ***
21 wboc-dmv.dmv.com (64.45.129.209) 233.701 ms 231.396 ms 232.031 ms
22 wboc-att.dmv.com (64.45.144.145) 233.534 ms 231.64 ms 232.045 ms
23 laurel-gw.dmv.com (64.45.129.81) 233.298 ms 231.672 ms 235.25 ms
24 www3.qsl.net (64.238.2.153) 261.631 ms 307.556 ms 258.162 ms
73,
John
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-15 1:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-14 22:27 Qsl.net availability John Coppens
2004-04-14 22:40 ` Dave Platt
2004-04-15 1:12 ` John Coppens [this message]
2004-04-14 22:56 ` John R. Marshall
2004-04-15 4:00 ` Scott Lambert
2004-04-15 12:02 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-05-07 2:10 Ariel Graneros
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040414221216.60b54309.john@jcoppens.com \
--to=john@jcoppens.com \
--cc=dplatt@radagast.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox