From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: Kevin <kevin@w1ngl.us>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: NETROM locking, was: Re: [PATCH 1/9] Use netdev_priv in NETROM and ROSE
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:33:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050131043337.GA16895@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050131030602Z8225224-1340+2359@linux-mips.org>
On Sun, Jan 30, 2005 at 07:05:49PM -0800, Kevin wrote:
> Message-Id: <20050131030602Z8225224-1340+2359@linux-mips.org>
Your mailer seems to be sending out mails without message ID. Seems like
time to fix it ;-)
> Will this fix this?
> kernel: net/netrom/nr_in.c:77: spin_lock(net/core/sock.c:ca9f2860) already
> locked by net/netrom/af_netrom.c/176
> kernel: net/netrom/af_netrom.c:914: spin_unlock(net/core/sock.c:ca9f2860)
> not locked
No. Try below patch from Alan Cox which should solve your issue and a
minor security hole in AF_ROSE.
73 de DL5RB op Ralf
netrom/nr_in.c | 11 +----------
rose/rose_route.c | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
Index: bk-afu/net/netrom/nr_in.c
===================================================================
--- bk-afu.orig/net/netrom/nr_in.c 2005-01-29 23:05:54.000000000 +0000
+++ bk-afu/net/netrom/nr_in.c 2005-01-31 04:23:37.098462856 +0000
@@ -74,7 +74,6 @@
static int nr_state1_machine(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
int frametype)
{
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
switch (frametype) {
case NR_CONNACK: {
nr_cb *nr = nr_sk(sk);
@@ -103,8 +102,6 @@
default:
break;
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -116,7 +113,6 @@
static int nr_state2_machine(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb,
int frametype)
{
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
switch (frametype) {
case NR_CONNACK | NR_CHOKE_FLAG:
nr_disconnect(sk, ECONNRESET);
@@ -132,8 +128,6 @@
default:
break;
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
-
return 0;
}
@@ -154,7 +148,6 @@
nr = skb->data[18];
ns = skb->data[17];
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
switch (frametype) {
case NR_CONNREQ:
nr_write_internal(sk, NR_CONNACK);
@@ -265,12 +258,10 @@
default:
break;
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
-
return queued;
}
-/* Higher level upcall for a LAPB frame */
+/* Higher level upcall for a LAPB frame - called with sk locked */
int nr_process_rx_frame(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
nr_cb *nr = nr_sk(sk);
Index: bk-afu/net/rose/rose_route.c
===================================================================
--- bk-afu.orig/net/rose/rose_route.c 2005-01-29 23:05:54.000000000 +0000
+++ bk-afu/net/rose/rose_route.c 2005-01-31 04:23:37.111460880 +0000
@@ -727,7 +727,8 @@
}
if (rose_route.mask > 10) /* Mask can't be more than 10 digits */
return -EINVAL;
-
+ if(rose_route.ndigis > 8) /* No more than 8 digipeats */
+ return -EINVAL;
err = rose_add_node(&rose_route, dev);
dev_put(dev);
return err;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-31 4:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-30 21:21 [PATCH 1/9] Use netdev_priv in NETROM and ROSE Ralf Baechle DL5RB
[not found] ` <20050131030602Z8225224-1340+2359@linux-mips.org>
2005-01-31 4:33 ` Ralf Baechle [this message]
2005-02-15 17:58 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050131043337.GA16895@linux-mips.org \
--to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
--cc=kevin@w1ngl.us \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox