From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Subject: Re: AX.25 in tcpdump. Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2005 12:56:26 +0200 Message-ID: <20050925105626.GB4444@linux-mips.org> References: <4335D980.503@rns-stearn.demon.co.uk> <620c9057050924172134d0069e@mail.gmail.com> <43367A25.70805@rns-stearn.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43367A25.70805@rns-stearn.demon.co.uk> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Richard Stearn Cc: linux-hams On Sun, Sep 25, 2005 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Richard Stearn wrote: > Chuck Hast wrote: > >If you get the info would you do the ROSE stuff (we use FPAC here in FL > >which is a super set of ROSE which is actually X.25) ? > > Chuck > > Yes, but a qualified one. Can we establish that it actually needs to be > done? > > A grep for 8208 turns up: > > print-llc.c: { LLCSAP_ISO8208, "ISO8208" }, > > so I would like to try connecting that in as the print routine and have > someone test the result before I look at coding a print-rose.c. If the > 8208 implementation in print-llc is close then I could use that as a > starting > point and just add the extras to create a print-rose or look at extending > print-llc (which might be be vetoed by the current maintainer). ROSE is supposedly the X.25 PLP (Packet Layer Protocol), so I suggest you get yourself a copy of the ITU's X.25 spec. Fortunately the ITU permits upto 3 free downloads of their otherwise pricey specs per person and year. 73 de DL5RB op Ralf -- Loc. JN47BS / CQ 14 / ITU 28 / DOK A21