From: Nate Bargmann <n0nb@networksplus.net>
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Most "HAM" friendly distro ?
Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:09:36 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060104230936.GD12936@mail.networksplus.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9923fd660601041255o4e45fd5dw572a79848c1781ff@mail.gmail.com>
* Douglas Cole <doug.n7bfs@gmail.com> [2006 Jan 04 15:21 -0600]:
> So my question is, which distro' would one reccomend to someone who is
> used to using a distro' that does not require recompiling the kernel
> every time I turn around?
Debian seems to have a very modular kernel with most, if not all, of
the ham radio support enabled. A number of hams are active in Debian
which helps the ham radio support, IMO.
> I was thinking maybe Kubuntu, or one of the Debian based distro's just
> for the sake of the ease with which APT makes updating/upgrading, but
> since I have not spent enough time with Debian based distro's I am not
> sure that is going to fit my needs.
Unless the Kubuntu team builds a radically different kernel, it's ham
radio support should be about equal.
> But what 2.6 kernel-based distro' really shines for use Amateur radio
> opp's at the moment ?
Check out Harv's Ham Shack. It seems to be a ham radio oriented
distribution.
73, de Nate >>
--
Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB | Successfully Microsoft
Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @ | free since January 1998.
http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/ | "Debian, the choice of
My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @ | a GNU generation!"
http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/ | http://www.debian.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-01-04 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-01-04 20:55 Most "HAM" friendly distro ? Douglas Cole
2006-01-04 21:26 ` IT3 Stuart Blake Tener
2006-01-04 23:28 ` Alex Flinsch
2006-01-07 17:43 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2006-01-04 23:09 ` Nate Bargmann [this message]
2006-01-04 23:19 ` Jeremy Utley
2006-01-05 1:31 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-05 2:14 ` Nate Bargmann
2006-01-04 23:46 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-05 0:40 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-06 13:15 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:19 ` Margaret Leber
2006-01-06 14:26 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:58 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-06 17:11 ` K. David Prince
2006-01-06 17:58 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-05 0:27 ` Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2006-01-05 1:08 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-05 1:29 ` Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2006-01-05 3:21 ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-05 4:36 ` Curt Mills
2006-01-05 7:07 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-06 14:37 ` Curt, WE7U
2006-01-06 17:39 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-06 17:51 ` Curt, WE7U
2006-01-07 15:03 ` Most 'HAM' " w9ya
2006-01-06 23:27 ` Most "HAM" " Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-07 2:10 ` Bob Nielsen
2006-01-07 9:11 ` Ian Haver
2006-01-07 14:10 ` Nate Bargmann
2006-01-07 19:38 ` Curt Mills
2006-01-07 19:19 ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2006-01-09 12:01 ` stephen
2006-01-09 12:41 ` Hamish Moffatt
2006-01-09 13:08 ` Nate Bargmann
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-05 2:26 Adam Vazquez Kb2jpd
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060104230936.GD12936@mail.networksplus.net \
--to=n0nb@networksplus.net \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).