From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Subject: Re: Most "HAM" friendly distro ? Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 01:26:10 +1100 Message-ID: <20060106142610.GA17583@cloud.net.au> References: <9923fd660601041255o4e45fd5dw572a79848c1781ff@mail.gmail.com> <20060104234631.GA20864@cloud.net.au> <9923fd660601041640n4602e3a4n304b37acfc429ce9@mail.gmail.com> <20060106131537.GA16382@cloud.net.au> <43BE7C5C.8030506@voicenet.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BE7C5C.8030506@voicenet.com> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 09:19:08AM -0500, Margaret Leber wrote: > Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > >Debian installation used to be (perceived as) hard, but that shouldn't > >be true any more. > > > >Ubuntu (and presumably Kubuntu) is using the new Debian installer. > > I upgraded my aging Red Hat 7.1 installation to Ubuntu 5.10. (OK, it > wasn't an upgrade install as such; I just stuck in a new HD (I needed > one) and created a dual boot system. > > I'm very, very pleased with the results. Installation was quite easy. Great. I'd be even more pleased if you'd gone with Debian instead. :) Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB