linux-hams.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: "Mike McCarthy, W1NR" <lists@w1nr.net>
Cc: 'Douglas Cole' <doug.n7bfs@gmail.com>, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: AX25 patches and how it affects the end user
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:09:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060113210925.GB3516@linux-mips.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000d01c616fc$5624f4b0$3849a8c0@lan.w1nr.net>

On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 05:14:05PM -0500, Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote:

> Hi Douglas,
>    Your best bet is to run the latest "stable" release.  Unstable's are for
> those with time and expertise to "hack".
>    It all depends on when Debian updates it's kernel.  The patches have gone
> into the latest "git" on Kernel.org.  When Debian fetches the kernel from
> there is anyone's guess.  In about another week, SuSE will release 10.1
> Beta1.  I don't even know if it will get into that.  You can always install
> Debian and get the kernel source from kernel.org and build it.  I would at
> least wait until 2.6.15.1 (in kernel.org's numbering) instead of trying to
> patch things.
>    If Debian is running the 2.6.14 kernel, then you are probably OK.  The
> changes that broke it are not in that version.  These "patches" that you see
> are due to recent changes for multiprocessor hardware, but other things got
> broken at the same time.

Not quite.  The locking bugs in mkiss were introduced when adding SMACK
support.  When a little later the locking code - really only relevant to
multiprocessor or preemptable kernels - was changed, the bugs started to
show up on uniprocessor kernels as well.

Shit happens - but better let's fix it.

  Ralf

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-01-13 21:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-01-11 17:45 AX25 patches and how it affects the end user Douglas Cole
2006-01-11 22:14 ` Mike McCarthy, W1NR
2006-01-12  0:55   ` Douglas Cole
2006-01-13 21:09   ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB [this message]
2006-01-17 16:59     ` Bernard Pidoux
2006-01-18  1:08       ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2006-01-18  8:38         ` ROSE lockup fix Ralf Baechle DL5RB
2006-01-19 16:44           ` Bernard Pidoux
2006-02-09 16:25           ` Bernard Pidoux
2006-01-18 12:26         ` AX25 patches and how it affects the end user Chuck Hast
2006-01-18 21:52           ` Ralf Baechle DL5RB

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060113210925.GB3516@linux-mips.org \
    --to=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=doug.n7bfs@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lists@w1nr.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).