From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle DL5RB Subject: Re: Document request - ROSE protocol specification Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 04:25:20 +0000 Message-ID: <20070319042520.GB25380@linux-mips.org> References: <45F87682.8010206@rns-stearn.demon.co.uk> <620c90570703141711v444bd67dqd9cf8e86a6fc1b54@mail.gmail.com> <45F92C62.2030707@ccr.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45F92C62.2030707@ccr.jussieu.fr> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Bernard Pidoux Cc: Chuck Hast , Richard Stearn , linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 12:22:10PM +0100, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > > Also perhaps Bernard F6BVP can provide you information or Jean-Paul > > ROSE adressing follows the X.121 specs and uses 14 digits. > > There is a good description here : > http://www.rhyshaden.com/x25.htm > > Linux kernel source provides diagnostic codes and specs. > For example in /linux/include/net/rose.h : I would warn to take the Linux kernel code as a proper definition of the ROSE protocol. While Linux may be the dominant ROSE implementation today the protocol code contains quite a few oddities that make me scratch the head to say the least. Ralf