From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hamish Moffatt Subject: Re: AX25 tools and packages Date: Thu, 2 Aug 2007 11:24:51 +1000 Message-ID: <20070802012451.GA1238@cloud.net.au> References: <5abd436b0707261023nada8cf5n90532459745cd2ac@mail.gmail.com> <20070728133557.GA30168@linux-mips.org> <200708011705.21226.n7ipb@wetnet.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200708011705.21226.n7ipb@wetnet.net> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 05:05:18PM -0700, Ken Koster wrote: > On Saturday 28 July 2007, Ralf Baechle DL5RB wrote: > > Actually DL9SAU and me have moved the development away to another > > machine a while ago when Sourceforge was basically unusable for weeks. > > The new site is {cvs,www,ftp}.linux-ax25.org. Thomas DL9SAU has done > > various improvments and plenty of bugfixing as necessary to keep the > > tools in shape for newer Linux distributions, but what we haven't done > > yet and what is really overdue is a formal release. > > I'm sure that many of us would appreciate a formal release, even if it's not > perfect. > > I'm using the latest patches from Debian since that seemed to be the latest > I could find. Because my current builds are targeted at a 2.4 series kernel in > an embedded system they work with a few small patches but I'm planning > on switching to 2.6 as soon as possible. There appears to be a misconception that 2.6 requires new tools. Notice that Ralf said newer Linux distributions (meaning newer libc, gcc etc) rather than newer kernels. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB