From: Matti Aarnio <matti.aarnio@zmailer.org>
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mkiss kernel driver problems
Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:33:17 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20091001143317.GD22922@mea-ext.zmailer.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091001115809.GC22922@mea-ext.zmailer.org>
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 02:58:09PM +0300, Matti Aarnio wrote:
> Mostly the mkiss line discipline module seems to work, but..
>
> mkiss: ax0: crc mode is auto.
> mkiss: ax0: Switchting to crc-smack
>
> that typo (extra 't') is obvious, but I am wondering,
> why it has growing error counter:
Aargh.. error rate is near 4/256 - meaning I forgot to KISS encode
the SMACK CRC bytes...
But this Brown Paper Bag type "user error" is no excuse for
that kernel typo.
Why do I need to feed AX.25 frames from user program to kernel
with SMACK code variant? My aprx software reads async serial
ports itself, and does all manner of port re-init in case of
for example an USB serial dongle needing it.
To live with kernel AX.25 network, serial ports that are not
attached to kernel with kissattach/mkiss do need to be fed
to kernel. However the feed method may sometimes write incomplete
frame to kernel, and having 1-(2^-16) change of spotting that
is better than without SMACK -- plain KISS has 0 change of spotting
incomplete frame.
What I really would like is to use socket to feed to kernel
AX.25 packets that I got from somewhere, but somehow it does
look like it is not possible at all. I would do AX.25 socket
creation, bind() it with callsign I want, and then to send()
using that socket _without_ destination address having ever
been defined. But I do not think that is really possible, all
sockets are "application" side, never "network devices".
Or can somebody come up with a fancy way to use for example
the raw socket for this ?
That is, a socket which says "I am device N0NNN-5", and sends
raw AX.25 frame to kernel AX.25 "network."
Heck.. I would like to bridge AX.25 network using SCTP's
reliable datagram protocol (or IP/UDP). The Bridge software
would reside in userspace, but how could I pass a packet
most easily to kernel without going via pty+kiss mess ?
> ax0 Link encap:AMPR AX.25 HWaddr OH2MQK-1
> UP BROADCAST RUNNING NOARP MTU:512 Metric:1
> RX packets:9325 errors:152 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
> TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0
> collisions:0 txqueuelen:10
> RX bytes:622232 (607.6 KiB) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b)
>
> I am feeding this interface from my own software via pty interface,
> where the client side is turned on to KISS line discipline.
>
> My own software is not complaining about incomplete writes,
> thus I wonder what the kernel is doing ? Also my software
> is sending on only AX.25 frames that it considers to be valid.
>
> Does anybody remember how the mkiss.c is supposed to work?
73 de Matti, OH2MQK
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-01 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-01 11:58 mkiss kernel driver problems Matti Aarnio
2009-10-01 14:33 ` Matti Aarnio [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20091001143317.GD22922@mea-ext.zmailer.org \
--to=matti.aarnio@zmailer.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox