From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] ROSE: Misc fixes Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 15:06:14 +0100 Message-ID: <20110808140614.GB2120@linux-mips.org> References: <4E270D35.9070306@free.fr> <20110720175950.GA13753@linux-mips.org> <4E293E96.3030708@free.fr> <20110722105641.GA24477@linux-mips.org> <4E33351A.2040907@free.fr> <4E3FE760.1050909@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4E3FE760.1050909@free.fr> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: f6bvp Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:40:48PM +0200, f6bvp wrote: > Hello Ralf, > > Since my last post my two ROSE/FPAC nodes have been running > flawlessly with last ROSE patches for nearly 17 days. > Situation remains the same, i.e. from time to time use can still be > negative. > > Here is a /proc/net/rose/neigh dump from the machine running dual > core CPU with SMP kernel : > > /proc/net/rose_neigh > addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters > 00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 -1 DTE yes 0 0 > 00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0 > 00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0 > > For the present time "use" parameter has returned to 0 for F8COJ-11 > node neighbor on the other system without > manual change. > Thus I guess some situations can reinitialize "use" counter. > I will then investigate if use can also become negative on this > second system if I do not switch to UMP > mode at boot (removing maxcpus=1 boot option). > > /proc/net/rose_neigh > addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters > 00020 F6BVP-5 ax0 1 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00019 F6BVP-7 ax0 2 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00018 F6BVP-9 ax2 2 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00017 F3KT-11 ax0 3 0 DCE yes 0 0 > 00016 F8COJ-11 ax0 2 0 DCE yes 0 0 > 00015 F6GGY-9 ax0 3 0 DTE no 0 0 > .... > 00002 TI2HAS-9 ax0 5 0 DTE no 0 0 > 00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 0 DCE yes 0 0 This at least means there should be no regressions by my patch series and it's getting time to send it upstream in a few days when I sorted out my b0rked DSL line and new workstation. With these holes plugged finding what's actually causing the use counters to go negative should also have gotten a little easier. Thanks, Ralf