From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick Ouellette Subject: Re: AX25 and related software's future in Debian Date: Thu, 03 May 2012 22:17:52 -0400 Message-ID: <20120504021752.GB4017@flying-gecko.net> References: <20120504013200.GB3489@flying-gecko.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: Content-disposition: inline In-reply-to: Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Charles Suprin Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, debian-hams@lists.debian.org On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:03:57PM -0400, Charles Suprin wrote: > > Patrick, > > I find myself asking the question if the name collision had occurred > with emacs, vi, ls, cat, or anyone of a number of other programs would > the conversation be the same. There have been several good points in > the conversation. > > Good luck and thanks for the effort. It is a bigger problem than just > this small node app. > > Charles Charles, I have no doubt if the longer packaged program in question was one you listed, or many others, the new package would be summarily dismissed until it no longer conflicted. There would not even be discussion. I see the bigger problem too, but it seems like many or most in the node discussion are so focused on getting node.js the name node at any cost they haven't even considered the potential long term ramifications of their actions. The larger problem has been raised to the Debian project leader. Perhaps it will be addressed, perhaps not. 73, Pat NE4PO -- ,-----------------------------------------------------------------------------. > Patrick Ouellette | Lord, grant that I might not so much seek < > pat(at)flying-gecko.net | to be loved as to love. < > Amateur Radio: NE4PO | -- Francis of Assisi < `-----------------------------------------------------------------------------'