* AX25: help with testing/review of an ax25 patch
@ 2017-01-25 21:20 Sowmini Varadhan
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Sowmini Varadhan @ 2017-01-25 21:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ralf, linux-hams; +Cc: davem
Ralf, linux-hams,
The patch below is a consequence of the review comments
for the RFC patch at
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/719236/
which was itself a result of the disucssion at
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg415870.html
According to cscope, the only in-kernel driver that provides
a non-null ->validate is AX25, and I've made an attempt
to get this to return the size of the validated header
by code-inspection. However, I dont have the means or
expertise to test this, so I could use your testing/review
help. Can you please take a look?
thanks in advance
--Sowmini
diff --git a/include/linux/netdevice.h b/include/linux/netdevice.h
index 3868c32..d233ec8 100644
--- a/include/linux/netdevice.h
+++ b/include/linux/netdevice.h
@@ -271,7 +271,7 @@ struct header_ops {
void (*cache_update)(struct hh_cache *hh,
const struct net_device *dev,
const unsigned char *haddr);
- bool (*validate)(const char *ll_header, unsigned int len);
+ int (*validate)(const char *ll_header, unsigned int len);
};
/* These flag bits are private to the generic network queueing
@@ -2685,21 +2685,21 @@ static inline int dev_parse_header(const struct sk_buff *skb,
}
/* ll_header must have at least hard_header_len allocated */
-static inline bool dev_validate_header(const struct net_device *dev,
+static inline int dev_validate_header(const struct net_device *dev,
char *ll_header, int len)
{
if (likely(len >= dev->hard_header_len))
- return true;
+ return len;
if (capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO)) {
memset(ll_header + len, 0, dev->hard_header_len - len);
- return true;
+ return dev->hard_header_len;
}
if (dev->header_ops && dev->header_ops->validate)
return dev->header_ops->validate(ll_header, len);
- return false;
+ return dev->hard_header_len;
}
typedef int gifconf_func_t(struct net_device * dev, char __user * bufptr, int len);
diff --git a/net/ax25/ax25_ip.c b/net/ax25/ax25_ip.c
index 183b1c5..7a1c296 100644
--- a/net/ax25/ax25_ip.c
+++ b/net/ax25/ax25_ip.c
@@ -228,18 +228,23 @@ netdev_tx_t ax25_ip_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb)
}
#endif
-static bool ax25_validate_header(const char *header, unsigned int len)
+static int ax25_validate_header(const char *header, unsigned int len)
{
ax25_digi digi;
+ const unsigned char *data;
if (!len)
- return false;
+ return -EINVAL;
if (header[0])
- return true;
+ return len;
- return ax25_addr_parse(header + 1, len - 1, NULL, NULL, &digi, NULL,
+ data = ax25_addr_parse(header + 1, len - 1, NULL, NULL, &digi, NULL,
NULL);
+ if (!data)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return (data - (const unsigned char *)header);
}
const struct header_ops ax25_header_ops = {
diff --git a/net/packet/af_packet.c b/net/packet/af_packet.c
index ddbda25..7af09a3 100644
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -1845,6 +1845,7 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
__be16 proto = 0;
int err;
int extra_len = 0;
+ int newlen;
/*
* Get and verify the address.
@@ -1920,7 +1921,11 @@ static int packet_sendmsg_spkt(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg,
goto retry;
}
- if (!dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, len)) {
+ newlen = dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, len);
+ /* As comments above this function indicate, a full L2 header
+ * must be passed to this function, so if newlen > len, bail.
+ */
+ if (newlen < 0 || newlen > len) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto out_unlock;
}
@@ -2447,14 +2452,21 @@ static int tpacket_fill_skb(struct packet_sock *po, struct sk_buff *skb,
return -EINVAL;
} else if (copylen) {
int hdrlen = min_t(int, copylen, tp_len);
+ int newlen;
skb_push(skb, dev->hard_header_len);
skb_put(skb, copylen - dev->hard_header_len);
err = skb_store_bits(skb, 0, data, hdrlen);
if (unlikely(err))
return err;
- if (!dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, hdrlen))
+ newlen = dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, hdrlen);
+ if (newlen < 0)
return -EINVAL;
+ /* Caller has allocated for copylen in non-paged part of
+ * skb so we should never find newlen > hdrlen
+ */
+ WARN_ON(newlen > hdrlen);
+
if (!skb->protocol)
tpacket_set_protocol(dev, skb);
@@ -2857,10 +2869,13 @@ static int packet_snd(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len)
if (err)
goto out_free;
- if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW &&
- !dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, len)) {
- err = -EINVAL;
- goto out_free;
+ if (sock->type == SOCK_RAW) {
+ int newlen = dev_validate_header(dev, skb->data, len);
+
+ if (newlen < 0 || newlen > len) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto out_free;
+ }
}
sock_tx_timestamp(sk, sockc.tsflags, &skb_shinfo(skb)->tx_flags);
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-01-25 21:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-01-25 21:20 AX25: help with testing/review of an ax25 patch Sowmini Varadhan
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).