From: Lizhi Xu <lizhi.xu@windriver.com>
To: <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<edumazet@google.com>, <horms@kernel.org>, <kuba@kernel.org>,
<linux-hams@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<lizhi.xu@windriver.com>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<syzbot+2860e75836a08b172755@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>,
<syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] netrom: Preventing the use of abnormal neighbor
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:59:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029025904.63619-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <785c8add-ab09-47b2-94bf-a4bfe8c13388@redhat.com>
On Tue, 28 Oct 2025 15:13:37 +0100, Paolo Abeni wrote:
> > The root cause of the problem is that multiple different tasks initiate
> > SIOCADDRT & NETROM_NODE commands to add new routes, there is no lock
> > between them to protect the same nr_neigh.
> >
> > Task0 can add the nr_neigh.refcount value of 1 on Task1 to routes[2].
> > When Task2 executes nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour), it will
> > release the neighbour because its refcount value is 1.
> >
> > In this case, the following situation causes a UAF on Task2:
> >
> > Task0 Task1 Task2
> > ===== ===== =====
> > nr_add_node()
> > nr_neigh_get_dev() nr_add_node()
> > nr_node_lock()
> > nr_node->routes[2].neighbour->count--
> > nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour);
> > nr_remove_neigh(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour)
> > nr_node_unlock()
> > nr_node_lock()
> > nr_node->routes[2].neighbour = nr_neigh
> > nr_neigh_hold(nr_neigh); nr_add_node()
> > nr_neigh_put()
> > if (nr_node->routes[2].neighbour->count
> > Description of the UAF triggering process:
> > First, Task 0 executes nr_neigh_get_dev() to set neighbor refcount to 3.
> > Then, Task 1 puts the same neighbor from its routes[2] and executes
> > nr_remove_neigh() because the count is 0. After these two operations,
> > the neighbor's refcount becomes 1. Then, Task 0 acquires the nr node
> > lock and writes it to its routes[2].neighbour.
> > Finally, Task 2 executes nr_neigh_put(nr_node->routes[2].neighbour) to
> > release the neighbor. The subsequent execution of the neighbor->count
> > check triggers a UAF.
>
> I looked at the code quite a bit and I think this could possibly avoid
> the above mentioned race, but this whole area looks quite confusing to me.
>
> I think it would be helpful if you could better describe the relevant
> scenario starting from the initial setup (no nodes, no neighs).
OK. Let me fill in the origin of neigh.
Task3
=====
nr_add_node()
[146]if ((nr_neigh = kmalloc(sizeof(*nr_neigh), GFP_ATOMIC)) == NULL)
[253]nr_node->routes[2].neighbour = nr_neigh;
[255]nr_neigh_hold(nr_neigh);
[256]nr_neigh->count++;
neigh is created on line 146 in nr_add_node(), and added to node on
lines 253-256. It occurs before all Task0, Task1, and Task2.
Note:
1. [x], x is line number.
2. During my debugging process, I didn't pay attention to where the node
was created, and I apologize that I cannot provide the relevant creation
process.
BR,
Lizhi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-29 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-25 16:35 [syzbot] [hams?] KASAN: slab-use-after-free Read in nr_add_node syzbot
2025-10-18 20:37 ` syzbot
2025-10-19 5:02 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-19 5:21 ` syzbot
2025-10-19 5:10 ` Brahmajit Das
2025-10-19 5:10 ` syzbot
2025-10-20 8:13 ` [PATCH] netrom: Prevent race conditions between multiple add route Lizhi Xu
2025-10-20 10:10 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-20 11:02 ` [PATCH V2] " Lizhi Xu
2025-10-20 12:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-20 12:33 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-20 12:57 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-20 13:34 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-20 13:49 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-20 17:59 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-21 2:05 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-21 6:36 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-10-21 8:34 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-21 8:35 ` [PATCH V3] netrom: Prevent race conditions between neighbor operations Lizhi Xu
2025-10-23 11:44 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-23 11:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-10-23 12:41 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-23 13:50 ` [PATCH V4] netrom: Preventing the use of abnormal neighbor Lizhi Xu
2025-10-28 14:13 ` Paolo Abeni
2025-10-29 2:59 ` Lizhi Xu [this message]
2025-11-13 6:33 ` Lizhi Xu
2025-10-24 10:45 ` [PATCH V3] netrom: Prevent race conditions between neighbor operations Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251029025904.63619-1-lizhi.xu@windriver.com \
--to=lizhi.xu@windriver.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=syzbot+2860e75836a08b172755@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
--cc=syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).