From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CAD039935D; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782385533; cv=none; b=JFDoAA+toxaW0aH8sFk2wZ6mBwT8w2vPasGXbkXo9ZUIdufojMC4Xxg+SQILKoZDolmpC+V7JnKXjcOTXj0ygqv+QFLQaanZ9RVD+FXXxQClG5Es6Ca9DA34e+nFzZlxcATtDpWXw85B0Ubx1Qh94XORbSfZFzMrm4fAsU1nvgE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1782385533; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uxW6EkWjVTN1sa5ltf9VGrhY0/55bCbObofQQviLjvY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=KEZEld0X8efNAESkCCvzVtNpVEtOzztj7OLq0kTXnv8WscgxestXHj9NDEZr9rqmP23nzig4UkPiwsLryyhCUlNy3cHLYVJYREDgkGCPXoGWDvVoBO3DlCGtoNADCVIxgQxZkRCf6bYFWc9+xFpiTyYvpqcv1SdLM0PxjSiPqJQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=eKpMltyx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="eKpMltyx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 03B681F000E9; Thu, 25 Jun 2026 11:05:30 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1782385531; bh=tUkARHxqgFiPuume8xpZyaeJ+B5pIVmsfh78GoOA1qE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=eKpMltyxDNd3u63zTABfLLn42J1MUY4QDC+oCGPrbQh00CuSFRZE+B8xSzuCBYUi4 757hv8kjIlASJaGg0Nm/3U7/HlK51gA99GJAJi8SA+VzVZSyRztFanVZCuR8qzC+Bi 0Z7Ub5s+KhhMh6HvzMIlU4Nbkfw1qytMCxALM3W0= Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:04:19 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Bernard Pidoux Cc: kuba@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-hams@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [stable request] ROSE memory-safety fixes for 7.0.y and earlier (merged out-of-tree in linux-netdev/mod-orphan) Message-ID: <2026062543-think-rocker-6e19@gregkh> References: <2026061625-starless-mascot-691a@gregkh> <2026062048-posted-scarf-dcf2@gregkh> <2026062051-doorframe-crayon-d390@gregkh> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Jun 20, 2026 at 02:42:17PM +0200, Bernard Pidoux wrote: > Hi Greg, > > Thanks, much appreciated. > > Short answer: yes, the same series applies to 6.18.y, and the same bugs > exist in the older trees too -- but only 7.0.y and 6.18.y take the series > as-is. ROSE was removed in 7.1, so every stable line up to and including > 7.0.y still carries this code and is affected. > > I just test-applied this exact mbox with "git am" against the current > ROSE files of each tree: > > v7.0.13 : clean, 15/15 (what I sent you) > linux-6.18.y : clean, 15/15, no conflicts -- the teardown code is > identical to 7.0.13 Great, I've applied these to both now. > linux-6.12.y : applies up to patch 3, then conflicts in > rose_loopback.c (the loopback/timer code predates one > of the refactors the series builds on) > linux-6.6.y / 6.1.y / 5.15.y : same, conflict at the same patch > > So for 6.18.y I can send an identical batch right away. For 6.12.y and > the older LTS lines the fixes are still needed, but they need a rebased > backport rather than a straight cherry-pick; I'm happy to prepare those > per-tree once the format is settled. > > My suggestion, matching what you said: let's land this 7.0.y batch first > to work out the workflow. As soon as it's in I'll send the (identical) > 6.18.y batch, and then the rebased older-tree batches one line at a time. > Whatever order is easiest on your side works for me. What you sent was fine, no problems, if that works for you, it's fine for me. thanks, greg k-h