From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrea Borgia Subject: Re: newbie question - hamlib and gMFSK Date: Sat, 01 May 2004 17:26:45 +0200 Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <4093C1B5.8080308@cs.unibo.it> References: <1083420366.4194.8.camel@dhcppc3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1083420366.4194.8.camel@dhcppc3> List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org N5NW Marty wrote: > I have finally successfully installed gMFSK and hamlib, but gMFSK > doesn't seem to recognize that hamlib exists. No options for > configuration under preferences. hamlib support can be enabled/disabled from the preferences panel only if gMFSK has been built with hamlib option turned on. Quoting from memory, the ./configure script in gMFSK sources automatically detects hamlib's presence during build, but you might always add --enable-hamlib to be on the safe side. > Any thoughts? I'm trying to move completely away from the Microsoft > environment in the shack, and this seems like a critical step. I am My ham radio activity is supported entirely by Linux: hamlib, xlog (with hamlib support), gMFSK (with hamlib support) plus cwdaemon for fun and occasionally the soundmodem to test the ax25 connection to my club's cluster node. I have installed qsstv also, but it didn't interest me enough to bother to really test it. > very much the newbie with linux - not much beyond the > ./configure|make|make install stage. I'm using Mandrake 9.2 in a > triple boot environment (DOS/Win98/Linux). Nothing bad with being a newbie, but you're past that stage if you're already comfortable with building from sources 8-) > If there is a more appropriate forum for the question, please advise. I think this list is appropriate enough, but just in case you want something a bit more focused you should try xlog-discussion and hamlib-developers (see websites for links). B73, Andrea. -- Homepage: http://andrea.borgia.bo.it / Amateur radio: IZ4FHT A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?