From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bill Vodall <wa7nwp@jnos.org>
Subject: Re: CONVER to APRS
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:27:35 -0800
Message-ID: <43CC01B7.5030402@jnos.org>
References: <1137294130.19159.24.camel@localhost> <43CBEE42.2080104@jnos.org> <620c90570601161127s13dde970i10e94290cbc3a4bc@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <620c90570601161127s13dde970i10e94290cbc3a4bc@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-hams.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org


> Neat idea, just wonder how it will impact the APRS channel if there were a
> lot of converse activity.

CONVERS is about dead.  APRS "activity" is dieing.  Both need a jump 
start.  If it gets busy, we have lots of underused spectrum to light up. 
   On the air activity is a good thing.

Bill