From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bill Vodall WA7NWP Subject: CONVERS Primary server Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2006 22:07:05 -0800 Message-ID: <43F56809.7090501@jnos.org> References: <5.2.1.1.0.20060129225800.0117b6e8@pop.av.eastlink.ca> <1138629532.7628.2.camel@CO> <43DE5851.33E01B71@free.fr> <43DE7B4B.5040509@jnos.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org I'm setting up a couple CONVERS nodes. Everything is going good but I'm a bit confused with the comments in the CONF file. === # Link: # # Parameters: [primary_link] Link Chicpe irc.n1uro.ampr.org:3600 Link SpamNet-1 eth1.mara.org:3600 Chicpe # Link Kuopio_Fl blues.pspt.fi:3600 SpamNet-1 # Link USAHub 199.0.154.23:3600 Kuopio_Fl # # In the above example, Kuopio_FI is your primary link, Stockholm is # a backup for Kuopio_FI, and Foobar is a backup for Stockholm. conversd # will try to keep connected with Kuopio_FI, and use Stockholm and # Foobar as backups in the listed order of preferrence. === Is this saying that Chicpe is the local primary link and the primary link also by SpamNet. Or is the primary link OF Chicpe SpamNet-1 and thus it'll be the local backup? Are these hosts still valid? Thanks, Bill - WA7NWP