From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Ranch <linux-hams@trinnet.net>
Subject: Re: AX25 help site
Date: Sat, 05 Sep 2009 13:40:58 -0700
Message-ID: <4AA2CCDA.4060400@trinnet.net>
References: <9923fd660908310727o354e03dqaf90abe05b4ea800@mail.gmail.com> <1251842807.8971.1.camel@w8iss-desktop> <4A9DA743.9090101@radagast.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <4A9DA743.9090101@radagast.org>
Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-hams.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: Dave Platt <dplatt@radagast.org>
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org


Hello Dave,

. . .
> I personally feel that both the TNC-X code, and soundmodem,
> were slightly in violation of good engineering practice
> (i.e. "be conservative in what you send, and liberal in what
> you're able to receive") and that modifying the soundmodem
> code to comply with the "SHOULD" recommendation in the AX.25
> spec would be appropriate.  Since it's his code, I haven't
> pursued the matter further... I just patch it locally any time
> I install a new version.


Curious, does your soundmodem patch cleanly apply against Soundmodem 0.14?

   http://www.baycom.org/~tom/ham/soundmodem/


I think I've been seeing some strange compatibility issues with some
local TNCs and I'd like to see if this patch would help.

Maybe you could post it on the web somewhere?

--David