From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ray Wells Subject: Re: Why screw with the AX.25 configs? Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 13:57:40 +1100 Message-ID: <4D7D8424.1070202@exemail.com.au> References: <4D7D2BAB.9010909@exemail.com.au> <20110314014414.GG8243@x-berg.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110314014414.GG8243@x-berg.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: Thomas Osterried Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org On 14/03/11 12:44, Thomas Osterried wrote: >> 2. I use libax25, ax25-apps and ax25-tools sources from F6BVP >> because they contain fixes that AFAIK haven't been adopted in the >> official maintainers versions. > > Please explain any compatibility issue. > > 73, > - Thomas dl9sau > -- Who mentioned compatibility issues? I can only rely on exchanges in these forums and those exchanges suggest to me that some of Bernard's fixes (primarily as related to Rose/Fpac) haven't been adopted. I didn't say I was absolutely correct, I said AFAIK. I'm not starting a version war, just stating, in explaining differences that might exist between my installation and that of Curt, that I use the F6BVP versions for the reason previously stated. Ray vk2tv