Hello Ralf, Booting 3.0.1 kernel with ROSE patches in SMP mode gives systematically the following Inconsistent Lock State. See attached file. Bernard Le 08/08/2011 16:06, Ralf Baechle a écrit : > On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:40:48PM +0200, f6bvp wrote: > >> Hello Ralf, >> >> Since my last post my two ROSE/FPAC nodes have been running >> flawlessly with last ROSE patches for nearly 17 days. >> Situation remains the same, i.e. from time to time use can still be >> negative. >> >> Here is a /proc/net/rose/neigh dump from the machine running dual >> core CPU with SMP kernel : >> >> /proc/net/rose_neigh >> addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters >> 00005 F6BVP-5 ax2 1 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00004 F8COJ-11 ax2 2 -1 DTE yes 0 0 >> 00003 F6BVP-11 ax1 11 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00002 K4GBB-12 ax2 9 0 DCE yes 0 0 >> 00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 2 DCE yes 0 0 >> >> For the present time "use" parameter has returned to 0 for F8COJ-11 >> node neighbor on the other system without >> manual change. >> Thus I guess some situations can reinitialize "use" counter. >> I will then investigate if use can also become negative on this >> second system if I do not switch to UMP >> mode at boot (removing maxcpus=1 boot option). >> >> /proc/net/rose_neigh >> addr callsign dev count use mode restart t0 tf digipeaters >> 00020 F6BVP-5 ax0 1 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00019 F6BVP-7 ax0 2 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00018 F6BVP-9 ax2 2 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00017 F3KT-11 ax0 3 0 DCE yes 0 0 >> 00016 F8COJ-11 ax0 2 0 DCE yes 0 0 >> 00015 F6GGY-9 ax0 3 0 DTE no 0 0 >> .... >> 00002 TI2HAS-9 ax0 5 0 DTE no 0 0 >> 00001 RSLOOP-0 ??? 1 0 DCE yes 0 0 > This at least means there should be no regressions by my patch series and > it's getting time to send it upstream in a few days when I sorted out my > b0rked DSL line and new workstation. With these holes plugged finding > what's actually causing the use counters to go negative should also have > gotten a little easier. > > Thanks, > > Ralf