From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Cathryn Mataga Subject: Re: Netrom on kernel version 3.9.6-200 Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 22:42:03 -0700 Message-ID: <51D7AE2B.3070408@junglevision.com> References: <51D79AE6.5030208@junglevision.com> <51D7A082.1000500@junglevision.com> <51D7AC41.6060606@junglevision.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <51D7AC41.6060606@junglevision.com> Sender: linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" To: linux-hams On 7/5/2013 10:33 PM, Cathryn Mataga wrote: > On 7/5/2013 9:43 PM, Cathryn Mataga wrote: >> On 7/5/2013 9:19 PM, Cathryn Mataga wrote: >>> Hmm, is netrom known to work? I'm on 3.9.6-200, and I'm getting >>> weird results with netrom. >>> > > Wait, wait, this is definitely a Fedora issue and not a kernel issue. > Because I copied in nrattach that I compiled myself and it started > correctly. (I don't think it's a 'old versions of libax25 lying > around issue' but I haven't completely ruled that out yet.) Wait a minute. Someone has been mucking about with nrattach.c . They removed the the code that actually connects the netrom port. Bahh.. #ifdef notdef if (!startiface(dev, hp)) return 1; #endif