From: F6BVP <f6bvp@free.fr>
To: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Dan Cross <crossd@gmail.com>, David Ranch <dranch@trinnet.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com>
Subject: Re: [ROSE] [AX25] 6.15.10 long term stable kernel oops
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 16:04:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6a5cf9cf-9984-4e1b-882f-b9b427d3c096@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d073ac34a39c02287be6d67622229a1e@vanheusden.com>
Hi All,
I suspect I finally found the bug that triggered a kernel panic since
linux-15.1 version up to net-next.
Actually I found a report from
syzbot+dca31068cff20d2ad44d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
that directed me to the solution.
A pointer *p to a buffer was declared in tty_buffer_alloc() buf not
initialized.
Explanation :
- Sometime AX25 can perform connexions via a kissattached Ethernet port.
- In that case when an application sends a connect request from a
console, tty_port is used by mkiss.
All kernel panic reports I sent earlier show that mkiss_receive_buf was
involved together with tty_port_default and tty_ldisc_receive_buf.
It was sysbot detailed reporting KMSAN uninit value in mkiss_receive_buf
that led me to the solution. Although it took me a while to understand
the report for this is totally new for me...
Looking at the code I found :
static struct tty_buffer *tty_buffer_alloc(struct tty_port *port, size_t
size)
{
struct llist_node *free;
struct tty_buffer *p;
I first introduced a call to kmalloc in order to initialize pointer p
like it is done elsewhere in the function.
This performed well and Oops disappeared.
Then I tried to first initialize *p to NULL when it is declared :
struct tty_buffer *p=NULL;
When added it also performed correctly.
And finally I removed the kmalloc early instruction and only kept the
*p=NULL initialization.
Since then, I checked this simple initialization on both 6.15.2 and
6.17-rc2 and there was no more Oops.
I will provide the following patch against net-next in due form if there
is no objection.
diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
index 67271fc0b223..33e7f675b06d 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@ void tty_buffer_free_all(struct tty_port *port)
static struct tty_buffer *tty_buffer_alloc(struct tty_port *port,
size_t size)
{
struct llist_node *free;
- struct tty_buffer *p;
+ struct tty_buffer *p=NULL;
/* Round the buffer size out */
size = __ALIGN_MASK(size, TTYB_ALIGN_MASK);
Bernard
Le 22/08/2025 à 05:10, Folkert van Heusden a écrit :
> Bernard,
>
> I skimmed over the diff between the latest 6.14.y and latest 6.15.y tags
> of the raspberry pi linux kernel and didn't saw anything relevant
> changed. Altough changes in 'arch' could in theory affect everything.
>
>
> On 2025-08-22 00:39, F6BVP wrote:
>> As I already reported mkiss never triggered any Oops kernel panic up
>> to linux-6.14.11.
>>
>> In that version I put a number of printk inside of mkiss.c in order to
>> follow the normal behaviour and content outside and during FPAC
>> functionning especially when issuing a connect request.
>>
>> On the opposite an FPAC connect request systematically triggers a
>> kernel panic with linux-6.15.2 and following kernels.
>>
>> In 6.14.11 I observe that when mkiss runs core/dev is never activated
>> i.e. neither __netif_receive_skb nor __netif_receive_skb_one_core.
>>
>> These functions appear in kernel 6.15.2 panics after mkiss_receive_buf.
>>
>> One can guess that mkiss_receive_buf() is triggering something wrong
>> in kernel 6.15.2 and all following kernels up to net-next.
>>
>> The challenge to locate the bug is quite difficult as I did not find
>> the way to find relevant code differences between both kernels in
>> absence of inc patch...
>>
>> I sincerely regret not knowing how to go further.
>>
>> Bernard,
>> hamradio f6bvp /ai7bg
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-24 14:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <11c5701d-4bf9-4661-ad8a-06690bbe1c1c@free.fr>
[not found] ` <fff0b3eb-ea42-4475-970d-30622dc25dca@free.fr>
2025-08-16 18:45 ` [ROSE] [AX25] 6.15.10 long term stable kernel oops Bernard Pidoux
2025-08-18 10:00 ` Bernard Pidoux
2025-08-18 10:04 ` Folkert van Heusden
2025-08-18 14:19 ` F6BVP
2025-08-18 16:30 ` Dan Cross
2025-08-18 18:28 ` F6BVP
2025-08-18 22:11 ` Dan Cross
2025-08-18 22:31 ` F6BVP
2025-08-20 8:50 ` F6BVP
2025-08-20 19:33 ` kworker/u16 Not tainted F6BVP
2025-08-21 11:28 ` [ROSE] [AX25] 6.15.10 long term stable kernel oops F6BVP
2025-08-21 17:49 ` F6BVP
2025-08-21 22:39 ` [ROSE] [AX25] 6.15.10 long term stable kernel oops F6BVP
2025-08-22 3:10 ` Folkert van Heusden
2025-08-24 14:04 ` F6BVP [this message]
2025-08-25 12:40 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-08-26 13:31 ` F6BVP
2025-08-26 13:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-08-27 14:16 ` F6BVP
2025-08-27 17:30 ` Florian Westphal
2025-08-28 16:39 ` F6BVP
2025-08-30 23:37 ` F6BVP
2025-09-01 12:04 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-09-01 12:05 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <cd0461e0-8136-4f90-df7b-64f1e43e78d4@trinnet.net>
2025-09-01 15:59 ` F6BVP
2025-09-01 16:03 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-09-01 19:10 ` David Ranch
2025-09-01 19:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-09-02 7:44 ` F6BVP
2025-09-02 7:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-09-03 9:51 ` [BUG] [ROSE] slab-use-after-free in lock_timer_base Bernard Pidoux
2025-09-03 10:01 ` Eric Dumazet
2025-09-03 10:11 ` F6BVP
2025-09-03 11:07 ` Takamitsu Iwai
2025-09-01 19:04 ` [ROSE] [AX25] 6.15.10 long term stable kernel oops David Ranch
2025-09-02 7:54 ` F6BVP
2025-08-19 21:17 ` [OT] " Miroslav Skoric
2025-08-16 17:02 Bernard Pidoux
2025-08-16 17:35 ` David Ranch
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6a5cf9cf-9984-4e1b-882f-b9b427d3c096@free.fr \
--to=f6bvp@free.fr \
--cc=crossd@gmail.com \
--cc=dranch@trinnet.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=folkert@vanheusden.com \
--cc=linux-hams@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox