From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: John@man.ac.uk
Subject: Re: KDE EchoLinux client project
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:26:13 +0100 (BST)
Sender: linux-hams-owner@localhost
Message-ID: <E192uui-0005mL-Q2@probity.mcc.ac.uk>
References: <20030408142024.GA3921@leo.tneu.visi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-hams-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030408142024.GA3921@leo.tneu.visi.com>
List-Id: <linux-hams.vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: tim@tneu.visi.com
Cc: linux-hams@vger.kernel.org

On  8 Apr, Tim Neu wrote:

> I'd say most of us Linux folks would just be happy with something that
> works!    

True!

> Once you have basic functionality, then the KDE folks can make their QT
> version and the Gnome folks can make their GTK version.    

Gnome is built on GTK, and the two are not tied together as you imply,
as GTK based applications existed long before either Gnome or KDE. GTKis
a derivative of the GIMP software NOT Gnome.

John